Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The ethics of screening: is 'screeningitis' an incurable disease?D. Shickle & R. Chadwick - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (1):12-18.
    Screening programmes are becoming increasingly popular since prevention is considered 'better than cure'. While earlier diagnosis may result in more effective treatment for some, there will be consequent harm for others due to anxiety, stigma, side-effects etc. A screening test cannot guarantee the detection of all 'abnormal' cases, therefore there will be false reassurance for some. A proper consideration of the potential benefit and harm arising from screening may lead to the conclusion that the programme should not be offered. A (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Genetic screening.Ruth Chadwick - 1998 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (3):207-208.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Genetic screening.Ruth Chadwick - 1998 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (3):207-208.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Solidaroty and equity : new ethical frameworks for genetic databases.Ruth Chadwick & Kåre Berg - 2001 - .
    Genetic database initiatives have given rise to considerable debate about their potential harms and benefits. The question arises as to whether existing ethical frameworks are sufficient to mediate between the competing interests at stake. One approach is to strengthen mechanisms for obtaining informed consent and for protecting confidentiality. However, there is increasing interest in other ethical frameworks, involving solidarity — participation in research for the common good — and the sharing of the benefits of research.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • Informed consent and genetic research.Ruth Chadwick - unknown