Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Ambiguity" by Adam Sennet |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Aristotle, On Sophistical Refutations, Pickard-Cambridge (trans.), in The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, J. Barnes (ed.), 1984. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Aristotle, Metaphysics, W.D. Ross (trans.), in The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, J. Barnes (ed.), 1984. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Atherton, Catherine, 1993. The Stoics on Ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Atlas, Jay, 1989. Philosophy Without Ambiguity: A Logico-Linguistic Essay, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Bach, Kent, 1982. “Semantic Nonspecificity and Mixed Quantifiers,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 4: 593–605. (Scholar)
- Bach, Kent, 1999. “The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters,” in The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, K. Turner (ed.), Oxford: Elsevier, 65–84. (Scholar)
- Baker, Mark, 1997. “Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure,” in Elements of Grammar, Haegeman (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, 73–137. (Scholar)
- Bezuidenhout, Anne, 2002. “Truth-Conditional Pragmatics,” Philosophical Perspectives, 16: 105–134. (Scholar)
- Bittner, M., 2007. “Online Update: Temporal, Modal, and de Se Anaphora in Polysynthetic Discourse,” in Chris Barker & Pauline Jacobson (eds.), Direct Compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Camp, Elisabeth, 2006. “Metaphor and That Certain ‘Je Ne Sais Quoi’,” Philosophical Studies, 129: 1–25. (Scholar)
- Carlson, Greg N., 1982. “Generic Terms and Generic Sentences,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11: 145–181. (Scholar)
- Carlson, Greg N. and Pelletier, Francis Jeffry, 1995. The Generic Book, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Chomsky, Noam, 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Cruse, D. Alan, 1986. Lexical Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Culicover, P.W. and Jackendoff, R., 2005. Simpler Syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Dayal, Veneeta, 2004. “The Universal Force of Free Choice Any,” Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 4: 5–40. (Scholar)
- Donnellan, Keith S., 1966. “Reference and Definite Descriptions,” Philosophical Review, 75: 281–304. (Scholar)
- Dunbar, George, 2001. “Towards a Cognitive Analysis of Polysemy, Ambiguity and Vagueness,” Cognitive Linguistics, 12: 1–14. (Scholar)
- Field, Hartry, 1973. “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference,” Journal of Philosophy, 70: 462–81. (Scholar)
- Fiengo, Robert and Robert May, 1994. Indices and Identity (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 24), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Fodor, Jerry, 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Frege, Gottlob, 1948 [1892]. “Sense and Reference,” The Philosophical Review, 53: 209–230.
- Giannakidou, Anastasia, 2001. “The Meaning of Free Choice,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 24: 659–735. (Scholar)
- Greenough, Patrick, 2003. “Vagueness: A Minimal Theory,” Mind, 112: 235–81. (Scholar)
- Grice, H. P., 1975. “Logic and Conversation,” in Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Cole and Morgan (eds.), New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
- Grimshaw, Jane, 1992. Argument Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Heim, Irene, 1983. “File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness,” in Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, Bäuerle, Schwarze and von Stechow (eds.), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 164–90. Reprinted in Portner and Partee (eds.), 2002, 223–248. (Scholar)
- Heim, Irene, 1989. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, New York: Garland. (Scholar)
- Hobbs, Jerry, 1985. “Granularity,” Proceedings of the 9th ICAI, Los Angeles, CA, 432–5. (Scholar)
- Horn, Laurence, 2000. “Any and (-)ever: Free choice and free relatives,” in Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics, 71–111. (Scholar)
- Jacobson, Pauline, 1999. “Towards a Variable-Free Semantics,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 22: 117–184. (Scholar)
- Kadmon, Nirit and Fred Landman, 1993: “Any,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 16: 353–422. (Scholar)
- Kamp, J. A. W., 1981. “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation,” in Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Groenendijk, Janssen and Stokhof (eds.), Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre, 277–322. (Scholar)
- Kratzer, Angelika, 1977. “What ‘Must’ and ‘Can’ Must and Can Mean,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 1: 337–355. (Scholar)
- Kripke, Saul, 1977. “Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2: 255–276. (Scholar)
- Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara, 2007. “Polysemy, Prototypes and Radial Categories”. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 139–169. (Scholar)
- May, Robert, 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- May, Robert, 1991. The Grammar of Quantification, New York: Garland (facsimile edition of 1977 MIT Ph.D. Dissertation with 1991 preface). (Scholar)
- McKay, Thomas, 2006. Plural Predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Montague, Richard, 1973. “The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English.” Reprinted in Montague (1974), Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, R. Thomason (ed.), New Haven: Yale University Press, 247- 270. (Scholar)
- Nunberg, Geoffrey, 1978. The Pragmatics of Reference, Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. (Scholar)
- Nunberg, Geoffrey, 1995. “Transfers of Meaning,” Journal of Semantics, 12: 109–32. (Scholar)
- Partee, Barbara H., 1986. “Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles,” in Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, Groenendijk, de Jongh and M. Stokhof (eds.), Dordrecht: Foris, 115–143. Reprinted in Portner and Partee (eds.), 2002, 357–381. Reprinted in B. Partee, Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers by Barbara H. Partee, Oxford: Blackwell, 2004, 203–230. (Scholar)
- Partee, Barbara H., and Mats Rooth, 1983. “Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity,” in Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, Bäuerle, Schwarze and von Stechow (eds.), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 361–83. Reprinted in Portner and Partee (eds.), 2002, 334–356. (Scholar)
- Pietroski, Paul, 2005. “Meaning Before Truth,” in Contextualism in Philosophy, Preyer and Peters (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Pietroski, Paul and Norbert Hornstein, 2002. “Does Every Sentence Like This Exhibit A Scope Ambiguity?” in Belief and Meaning, Hinzen and Rott (eds.), Frankfurt: Hansel-Hohenhausen. (Scholar)
- Pynchon, Thomas, 2006, Against the Day, Penguin Press. (Scholar)
- Quine, W. V., 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” The Philosophical Review, 60: 20–43. (Scholar)
- Quine, W. V., 1960. Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Recanati, Francois, 1989. “The Pragmatics of What is Said,” Mind and Language, 4: 295–329. Reprinted in Pragmatics: A Reader, Davis (ed.), 1991. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–120. (Scholar)
- Recanati, Francois, 2004. Literal Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Ryle, Gilbert, 1949. The Concept of Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Schwarzschild, Roger, 2002. “Singleton Indefinites,” Journal of Semantics, 19: 289–314. (Scholar)
- Searle, John R., 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Shakespeare, William, Romeo and Juliet, any edition.
- Smith, Nicholas, 2005. “Vagueness as Closeness,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 83: 157 –183. (Scholar)
- Spade, P. V., 1996. Thoughts, Words and Things: An Introduction to Late Mediaeval Logic and Semantic Theory, Version 1.0. Bloomington: Indiana University. (Scholar)
- Stone, Matthew and Daniel Hardt, 1997. “Dynamic Discourse Referents for Tense and Modals,” Proceedings of IWCS, 2: 287–299. (Scholar)
- Strawson, P. F., 1950. “On Referring,” Mind 59: 320–344. (Scholar)
- Tuggy, David, 1993. “Ambiguity, Polysemy and Vagueness,” Cognitive Linguistics, 4: 273–290. (Scholar)
- Ward, Gregory, 2004. “Equatives and Deferred Reference,” Language, 80: 262- 289. (Scholar)
- Williams, Edwin, 1994. Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Zwicky, Arnold M. and Jerrold M. Sadock, 1975. “Ambiguity Tests and How to Fail Them,” in Syntax and Semantics, 4 Kimball (ed.), New York: Academic Press, 1–36. (Scholar)
Generated Thu May 23 04:47:08 2013
