Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Generic Generalizations" by Sarah-Jane Leslie and Adam Lerner
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Almotahari, M., 2022, “Kalām and Cognition”. In Muhammad Saleh Zarepour, ed., Islamic Philosophy of Religion: Analytic Perspectives Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group. (Scholar)
- –––, forthcoming, “Weak Generics”, Analysis. (Scholar)
- Asher, N. and D. Bonevac, 1996, “Prima Facie Obligation”, Studia Logica, 57(1): 19–45. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, “Common Sense
Obligation”, in Defeasible Deontic Logic, D. Nute
(ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 159–203. (Scholar)
- Asher, N. and M. Morreau, 1995, “What Some Generic Sentences Mean”, in Carlson and Pelletier 1995: 300–339. (Scholar)
- Asher, N. and F.J. Pelletier, 2012, “More Truths About
Generic Truth”, in Mari et al. 2012: 313–333. (Scholar)
- Bäck, A., 1996, “Review of Generische
Kennzeichnungen, by Gerhard Heyer (1987)”,
Noûs 30(2): 276–281. (Scholar)
- Baldwin, D.A., E. Markman, and R. Melartin, 1993,
“Infants’ Ability to Draw Inferences About Nonobvious
Object Properties: Evidence from Exploratory Play”, Child
Development, 64(3): 711–28. (Scholar)
- Barwise, J. and J. Perry, 1983, Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Brandone, A., A. Cimpian, S.J. Leslie, and S.A. Gelman, 2012, “Do Lions Have Manes? For Children, Generics Are About Kinds Not Quantities”, Child Development, 83(2): 423–433. (Scholar)
- Brandone, A., S.A. Gelman, and J. Hedglen, 2015,
“Children’s Developing Intuitions About the Truth
Conditions and Implications of Novel Generics Versus Quantified
Statements”, Cognitive Science, 39(4):
711–738. (Scholar)
- Burton-Roberts, N., 1977, “Generic Sentences and
Analyticity”, Studies in Language, 1:
155–196. (Scholar)
- Carlson, G., 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, Ph.D.
dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “On the Semantic Composition of
English Generic Sentences”, in Chierchia et al. 1989:
167–192. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “Truth Conditions of Generic
Sentences: Two Contrasting Views”, in G. Carlson and F.J.
Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, Chicago: Chicago
University Press, pp. 224–237. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Genericity”, in C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, and P. Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook vol. II, Chapter 47, Berlin: de Gruyter: Berlin, pp. 1153–1185. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Generic and Habitual
Aspect”, in R. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Tense
and Aspect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.
828–851. (Scholar)
- Cavedon, L. and S. Glasbey, 1994, “Outline of an
Information-Flow Model of Generics”, Acta Linguistica
Hungarica, 42. (Scholar)
- Carlson, G. and F.J. Pelletier (eds.), 1995, The Generic Book, Chicago: Chicago University Press. (Scholar)
- Cheng, K.Y., 2011, “A New Look at the Problem of Rule Following: A Generic Perspective”, Philosophical Studies, 155:1–21. (Scholar)
- Chierchia, G., 1995, “Individual Level Predicates as
Inherent Generics”, in Carlson and Pelletier 1995:
176–224. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, “Reference to Kinds Across Languages”, Natural Language Semantics, 6. (Scholar)
- Chierchia, G., B.H. Partee, and R. Turner (eds.), 1989,
Properties, Types and Meaning, Vol. II: Semantic Issues,
Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Cimpian, A., 2013, “Generic Statements, Causal Attributions,
and Children’s Naive Theories”, in Navigating the
Social World: The Early Years, M.R. Banaji and S.A. Gelman
(eds.), New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 269–274. (Scholar)
- Cimpian, A., A.C. Brandone, and S.A. Gelman, 2010, “Generic Statements Require Little Evidence for Acceptance but Have Powerful Implications”, Cognitive Science, 34(8): 1452–1482. (Scholar)
- Cimpian, A. and L.C. Erickson, 2012, “Remembering kinds: New
evidence that categories are privileged in children’s
thinking”, Cognitive Psychology, 64(3):
161–185. (Scholar)
- Cimpian, A., S.A. Gelman, and A.C. Brandone, 2010,
“Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of
generic sentences”, Language and Cognitive Processes,
25(2): 261–276. (Scholar)
- Cimpian, A. and E.M. Markman, 2009, “Information learned
from generic language becomes central to children’s biological
concepts: Evidence from their open-ended explanations”,
Cognition, 113(1): 14–25. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “The Generic/Nongeneric
Distinction Influences How Children Interpret New Information About
Social Others”, Child Development, 82(2):
471–492. (Scholar)
- Cimpian, A., Y. Mu, and L.C. Erickson, 2012, “Who Is Good at
This Game? Linking an Activity to a Social Category Undermines
Children’s Achievement”, Psychological Science,
23(5): 533–541. (Scholar)
- Cohen, A., 1996, Think Generic: The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences, Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, “Generics, Frequency Adverbs and Probability”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 22(3): 221–253. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, “On the Generic Use of
Indefinite Singulars”, Journal of Semantics, 18(3):
183–209. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “Generics and Mental Representation”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(5): 529–556. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “No Quantification Without
Reinterpretation”, in Mari et al. 2012: pp. 334–351. (Scholar)
- Cohen, A. and N. Erteschik-Shir, 1997, “Topic, Focus and the Interpretation of Bare Plurals”, in Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, P. Dekker, M. Stokhof, and Y. Venema (eds.), pp. 31–36. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Topic, Focus, and the Interpretation of Bare Plurals”, Natural Language Semantics, 10(2): 125–165. (Scholar)
- Dahl, O., 1975, “On Generics”, in Keenan 1975:
99–111. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985, Tense and Aspect Systems,
Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Declerk, R., 1986, “The Manifold Interpretations of Generic Sentences”, Lingua, 68: 149–188. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, “The Origins of
Genericity”, Linguistics, 29(1): 79–102. (Scholar)
- Delgrande, J.P., 1987, “A First-Order Conditional Logic for Prototypical Properties”, Artificial Intelligence, 33(1): 105–130. (Scholar)
- Diesing, M., 1992, Indefinites, Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press. (Scholar)
- Fara, M.G., 2005, “Dispositions and Habituals”, Noûs,39(1): 43–82. (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A., 2003, The Essential Child: Origins of
Essentialism in Everyday Thought, New York: Oxford University
Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Generics as a Window onto
Young Children’s Concepts”, in Kinds, Things, and
Stuff: The Cognitive Side of Generics and Mass Terms (New
Directions in Cognitive Science v. 12.), F.J. Pelletier (ed.), New
York: Oxford University Press, pp. 100–122. (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A. and P. Bloom, 2007, “Developmental Changes in the Understanding of Generics”, Cognition, 105(1): 166–183. (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A., P.J. Goetz, B.S. Sarnecka, and J. Flukes, 2008,
“Generic Language in Parent-Child Conversations”,
Language Learning and Development, 4(1): 1–31. (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A. and L. Raman, 2003, “Preschool Children Use
Linguistic Form Class and Pragmatic Cues to Interpret Generics”,
Child Development 74(1): 308–325. (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A., I. Sánchez Tapia, and S.J. Leslie, 2015,
“Memory for Generic and Quantified Sentences in Spanish-speaking
Children and Adults”, Journal of Child Language, epub
ahead of print. doi:10.1017/s0305000915000483 (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A., and T.Z. Tardif, 1998, “A Cross-Linguistic Comparison of Generic Noun Phrases in English and Mandarin”, Cognition, 66(3): 215–248. (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A., E.A. Ware, and F. Kleinberg, 2010, “Effects of
Generic Language on Category Content and Structure”,
Cognitive Psychology, 61(3): 273–301 (Scholar)
- Gerstner-Link, C., 1988, Uber Generizitat. Generische
Nominalphrasen in Singularen Aussagen und Generischen Aussagen,
Ph.D. dissertation, University of Munich. (Scholar)
- Geurts, B., 1985, “Generics”, Journal of
Semantics, 4(3): 247–255. (Scholar)
- Graham, S.A., S.L. Nayer, and S.A. Gelman, 2011,
“Two-Year-Olds Use the Generic/Non-generic Distinction to Guide
Their Inferences About Novel Kinds”, Child Development,
82(2): 493–507. (Scholar)
- Greenberg, Y., 2003, Manifestations of Genericity, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Haslam, N., L. Rothschild, and D. Ernst, 2000, “Essentialist
Beliefs About Social Categories”, British Journal of Social
Psychology, 39: 113–127. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Are Essentialist Beliefs
Associated with Prejudice?”, British Journal of Social
Psychology, 41: 87–100. (Scholar)
- Haslanger, S., 2011, “Ideology, Generics, and Common Ground”, in Feminist Metaphysics: Explorations in the Ontology of Sex, Gender, and the Self, Charlotte Witt (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 179–209. (Scholar)
- Heim, I., 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Scholar)
- Heyer, G., 1985, “Generic Descriptions, Default Reasoning,
and Typicality”, Theoretical Linguistics, 12(1):
33–72. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, “Generische Kennzeichnungen: Zur Logik und Ontologie Generischer Bedeutung”, München: Philosophia Verlag. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, “Semantics and Knowledge
Representation in the Analysis of Generic Descriptions”,
Journal of Semantics, 7: 93–110. (Scholar)
- Hesni, S., 2021, “Normative generics: Agains Semantic Polysemy”, Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 10(3): 218–225. (Scholar)
- Hollander, M.A., S.A. Gelman, and J. Star, 2002,
“Children’s Interpretation of Generic Noun Phrases”,
Developmental Psychology, 38(6): 883–894. (Scholar)
- Johnston, M., 2016, “Remnant Persons: Animalism’s
Undoing”, in Animalism: New Essays on Persons, Animals, and
Identity, S. Blatti and P. Snowdon (eds.), Oxford: Oxford
University Press, pp. 89–128. (Scholar)
- Johnston, M. and S.J. Leslie, 2012, “Concepts, analysis, generics and the Canberra plan”, Philosophical Perspectives, 26(1): 113–171. (Scholar)
- –––, 2019, “Cognitive Psychology
and the Metaphysics of Meaning”, Metaphysics and Cognitive
Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–205. (Scholar)
- Jönsson, M.L. and J.A. Hampton, 2006, “The Inverse Conjunction Fallacy”, Journal of Memory and Language, 55(3): 317–334. (Scholar)
- Kamp, H., 1981, “A Theory of Truth and Semantic
Interpretation”, in Formal Methods in the Study of
Language, J. Groenendijk, J. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.),
Dordrecht: Forts Publications, pp. 277–322. (Scholar)
- Kamp, H. and U. Reyle, 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
- Kaplan, D., 1989, “Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals”, in Themes from Kaplan, J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 481–563. (Scholar)
- Keenan, E.L. (ed.), 1975, Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Khemlani, S., S.J. Leslie, and S. Glucksberg, 2012, “Inferences About Members of Kinds: The Generics Hypothesis”, Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(6): 887–900. (Scholar)
- Kiss, K.E., 1998, “On Generic and Existential Bare Plurals and the Classification of Predicates”, in Events and Grammar, S. Rothstein (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 145–162. (Scholar)
- Knobe, J., S. Prasada, and G. Newman, 2013, “Dual Character Concepts and the Normative Dimension of Conceptual Representation”, Cognition, 127: 242–257. (Scholar)
- Kratzer, A., 1995, “Stage-Level and Individual-Level
Predicates”, in Carlson and Pelletier 1995: 125–176. (Scholar)
- Krifka, M., partly in collaboration with Claudia Gerstner, 1987,
An Outline of Genericity, SNS-Bericht 87–23,
University of Tubingen. (Scholar)
- Krifka, M., F. Pelletier, G. Carlson, A. ter Meulen, G. Chierchia, and G. Link, 1995, “Genericity: An Introduction”, in Carlson and Pelletier 1995: 1–125. (Scholar)
- Laca, B., 1990, “Generics Objects: Some More Pieces of the
Puzzle”, Lingua, 81: 25–46. (Scholar)
- Lawler, J., 1972, “Generic to a Fault”, in Papers
from the 8th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS
8), Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 247–258. (Scholar)
- –––, 1973, “Studies in English
generics”, University of Michigan Papers in
Linguistics, 1(1). (Scholar)
- Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D. and L. Stockall, 2013, “Genericity,
Exceptions and Domain Restriction: Experimental Evidence from
Comparison with Universals”, in Proceedings of Sinn und
Bedeutung, 17, E. Chemla, V. Homer, and G. Winterstein (eds.),
pp. 325–343. (Scholar)
- Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D., N. Katsos, and L. Stockall, 2015, “Genericity Is Easy? Formal and Experimental Perspectives”, Ratio, 28(4): 470–494. (Scholar)
- Lerner, A. and S.J. Leslie, 2013, “Generics, Generalism, and Reflective Equilibrium: Implications for Moral Theorizing from the Study of Language”, Philosophical Perspectives 27(1): 366–403. (Scholar)
- Leshin, R.A., S.J. Leslie, and M. Rhodes, 2021, “Does It
Matter How We Speak About Social Kinds? A Large, Preregistered, Online
Experimental Study of How Language Shapes the Development of
Essentialist Beliefs”, Child Development, 92(4):
e531–e547. (Scholar)
- Leslie, S.J., 2007, “Generics and the Structure of the Mind”, Philosophical Perspectives, 21(1): 375–403. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “Generics: Cognition and Acquisition”, Philosophical Review, 117(1): 1–47. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Generics Articulate Default Generalizations”, Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 41: 25–44. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “Carving Up the Social World with Generics”, Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, 1: 208–232. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015a, “Generics Oversimplified”, Noûs, 49(1): 28–54. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015b, “‘Hillary Clinton is the Only Man in the Obama Administration’: Dual Character Concepts, Generics, and Gender”, Analytic Philosophy, 56(2): 111–141. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, “The Original Sin of Cognition: Fear, Prejudice, and Generalization”, The Journal of Philosophy, 114(8): 1–29. (Scholar)
- Leslie, S.J. and S.A. Gelman, 2012, “Quantified Statements are Recalled as Generics: Evidence from Preschool Children and Adults”, Cognitive Psychology, 64(3): 186–214. (Scholar)
- Leslie, S.J., S. Khemlani, and S. Glucksberg, 2011, “Do All Ducks Lay Eggs? The Generic Overgeneralization Effect”, Journal of Memory and Language, 65(1): 15–31. (Scholar)
- Lewis, D., 1975, “Adverbs of Quantification”, in Keenan 1975: 3–15. (Scholar)
- Liebesman, D., 2011, “Simple Generics”, Noûs, 45(3): 409–442. (Scholar)
- Mannheim, B., S.A. Gelman, C. Escalante, M. Huayhua, and R. Puma,
2011, “A Developmental Analysis of Generic Nouns in Southern
Peruvian Quechua”, Language Learning and Development,
7(1): 1–23. (Scholar)
- Mari, A., C. Beyssade, and F.D. Prete (eds.), 2012,
Genericity, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- McCarthy, J., 1986, “Applications of Circumscription to Formalizing Commonsense Knowledge”, Artificial Intelligence, 28(1): 89–116. (Scholar)
- McConnell-Ginet, S., 2012, “Generic Predicates and Interest
Relativity”, Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 57(2):
289–302. (Scholar)
- ter Meulen, A., 1986, “Generic Information, Conditional
Contexts and Constraints”, in On Conditionals, E.C.
Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J.S. Reilly, and C.A. Ferguson (ed.).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–146. (Scholar)
- Meyer, M., S.A. Gelman, and S.M. Stilwell, 2011, “Generics
Are a Cognitive Default: Evidence from Sentence Processing”, in
Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the
Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA: Cognitive Science Society,
pp. 913–918. (Scholar)
- Milsark, G., 1974, Existential Sentences in English,
Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. (Scholar)
- Nickel, B., 2008, “Generics and the Way of Normality”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 31(6): 629–648. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Ceteris Paribus Laws: Generics and Natural Kinds”, Philosopher’s Imprint, 10(6): 1–25. [Nickel 2010 available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Dutchmen are Good Sailors:
Generics and Gradability”, in Mari et al. 2012:
390–405. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “The Role of Kinds in the Semantics of Ceterius Paribus Laws”, Erkenntnis, 79(10): 1729–1744. doi:10.1007/s10670-014-9638-5 (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, Between Logic and the World: An Integrated Theory of Generics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Nunberg, G. and C. Pan, 1975, “Inferring Quantification in
Generic Sentences”, in Papers from the Eleventh Regional
Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 11), Chicago:
Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 412–422. (Scholar)
- Nyugen, A. 2020, “The Radical Account of Bare Plural
Generics”, Philosophical Studies, 177:
1303–1331. (Scholar)
- Ojeda, Almerindo, 1991, “Definite Descriptions and Definite Generics”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 14: 367–397. (Scholar)
- Pelletier, F.J. and N. Asher, 1997, “Generics and Defaults”, in Handbook of Logic and Language, J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1125–1179. (Scholar)
- Platteau, F., 1980, “Definite and Indefinite
Generics”, in J. van der Auwera (ed.), The Semantics of
Determiners, London: Croom Helm, pp. 112–123, (Scholar)
- Prasada, S. and E.M. Dillingham, 2006, “Principled and Statistical Connections in Common Sense Conception”, Cognition, 99(1): 73–112. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Representation of Principled Connections: A Window onto the Formal Aspect of Common Sense Conception”, Cognitive Science, 33(3): 401–448. (Scholar)
- Prasada, S., S. Khemlani, S.J. Leslie, and S. Glucksberg. 2013, “Conceptual Distinctions Amongst Generics”, Cognition, 126(3): 405–422. (Scholar)
- Reiter, R., 1987, “Nonmonotonic Reasoning”, in
Annual Review of Computer Science, J.F. Traub, N.J. Nilsson,
and B.J. Grosz (eds.), Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc., pp.
147–186. (Scholar)
- Ritchie, K., 2019, “Should We Use Racial and Gender Generics?”, Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 8(1): 33–41. (Scholar)
- Rhodes, M., S.J. Leslie, and C. Tworek, 2012, “Cultural Transmission of Social Essentialism”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 109(34): 13526–13531. (Scholar)
- Rhodes, M., A. Cardarelli, and S.J. Leslie, 2020, “Asking
young children to ‘do science’ instead of ‘be
scientists’ increases science engagement in a randomized field
experiment”, Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 117(18): 9808–9814. (Scholar)
- Roberts, S. O., A.K. Ho, and S.A. Gelman, 2017, “Group
presence, category labels, and generic statements foster
children’s tendency to enforce group norms”, Journal
of Experimental Child Psychology, 158: 19–31. (Scholar)
- Rosch, E.H., 1978, “Principles of Categorization”, in Cognition and Categorization, E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (eds.), Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates, pp. 27–48. (Scholar)
- Schubert, L.K. and F.J. Pelletier. 1987, “Problems in
Representing the Logical Form of Generics, Bare Plurals, and Mass
Terms”, in New Directions in Semantics, E. Lepore (ed.),
London: Academic Press, pp. 385–451. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Generically Speaking, or Using
Discourse Representation Theory to Interpret Generics”, in
Chierchia et al. 1989: 193–268. (Scholar)
- Sloman, S.A., 1993, “Feature-Based Induction”,
Cognitive Psychology, 25(2): 231–280. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, “Categorical Inference Is Not a
Tree: The Myth of Inheritance Hierarchies”, Cognitive
Psychology 35(1): 1–33. (Scholar)
- Sorensen, R., 2012, “The Sorites and the Generic Overgeneralization Effect”, Analysis, 62(3): 444–449. (Scholar)
- Steele, C.M., 2010, Whistling Vivaldi: How Stereotypes Affect
Us and What We Can Do, New York: W.W. Norton & Company,
Inc. (Scholar)
- Steele, C.M. and J. Aronson, 1995, “Stereotype Threat and
the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans”,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5):
797–811. (Scholar)
- Sterken, R.K., 2015a, “Generics in Context”, Philosopher’s Imprint, 15(21): 1–30. [Sterken 2015 available online] (Scholar)
- Sterken, R. 2015b, “Leslie on generics”, Philosophical Studies, 172: 2493–512. (Scholar)
- Stump, G., 1985, The Semantic Variability of Absolute
Constructions, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Tardif, T., S.A. Gelman, X. Fu, and L. Zhu., 2011,
“Acquisition of Generic Noun Phrases in Chinese: Learning About
Lions Without an ‘-s’”, Journal of Child
Language, 30(1): 130–161. (Scholar)
- Teichman, M., 2016, “The Sophisticated Kind Theory”, Inquiry. Teichman 2016 available online (Scholar)
- Tessler, M. H., and N.D. Goodman, 2019, “The language of generalization”, Psychological Review, 126(3): 395. (Scholar)
- Ullman, T. and J. Tenenbaum, 2020, “Bayesian models of
conceptual development: Learning as building models of the
world”, Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 2:
533–558. (Scholar)
- Wasserman, R., 2011, “Dispositions and Generics”, Philosophical Perspectives, 25(1): 425–453. (Scholar)
- Wilkinson, K., 1995, “The Common Noun Kind”,
in Carlson and Pelletier 1995: 383–397. (Scholar)