Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Scientific Progress" by Ilkka Niiniluoto |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Aliseda, A., 2006, Abductive Reasoning. Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
- Almeder, R., 1983, “Scientific Progress and Peircean Utopian Realism.” Erkenntnis 20, 253–280. (Scholar)
- Aronson, J.L., Harré, R. and Way, E.C., 1994, Realism Rescued: How Scientific Progress is Possible. London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
- Balzer, W., 2000, “On Approximate Reduction,” in: Jonkisz and Koj (2000), pp. 153–170. (Scholar)
- Balzer, W., Pearce, D., and Schmidt, H.J. (eds.), 1984, Reduction in Science: Structure, Examples, Philosophical Problems. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- Balzwe, W., Moulines, C.U., and Sneed, J.D., 1987, An Architectonic for Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- Barrett, J. A., 2008, “Approximate Truth and Descriptive Nesting.” Erkenntnis 68, 213–224. (Scholar)
- Bird, A., 2007, “What Is Scientific Progress?” Noûs 41, 92–117. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “Scientific Progress as Accumulation of Knowledge: A Reply to Rowbottom.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39, 279–281. (Scholar)
- Böhme, G., 1977, “Models for the Development of Science,” in: I. Spiegel-Rösing and D. de Solla Price (eds.), Science, Technology, and Society. London: Sage Publications, pp. 319–351. (Scholar)
- Callebaut, W. and Pinxten, R. (eds.), 1987, Evolutionary Epistemology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- Chotkowski La Follette, M. (ed.), 1982, Quality in Science. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Dilworth, C., 1981, Scientific Progress: A Study Concerning the Nature of the Relation Between Successive Scientific Theories. Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Donovan, A., Laudan, L., and Laudan, R. (eds.), 1988, Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Doppelt, G., 1983, “Relativism and Recent Pragmatic Conceptions of Scientific Rationality,” in: N. Rescher (ed.), Scientific Explanation and Understanding. Lanham: University Press of America, pp. 107–142. (Scholar)
- Duhem, P., 1954, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Elkana, Y. et al. (eds.), 1978, Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators. New York: Wiley and Sons. (Scholar)
- Feyerabend, P., 1962, “Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism,” in: H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. II. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 28–97. (Scholar)
- –––, 1984, Wissenschaft als Kunst. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (Scholar)
- Foster, M.H.; Martin, M.L. (eds.), 1966, Probability, Confirmation,and Simplicity. New York: The Odyssey Press. (Scholar)
- Gärdenfors, P., 1988, Knowledge in Flux: Modelling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Gavroglu, K., Goudaroulis, Y. and Nicolacopoulos, P. (eds.), 1989, Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
- Hacking, I. (ed.), 1981, Scientific Revolutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Hanson, N.R., 1958, Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Harré, R. (ed.), 1975, Problems of Scientific Revolutions: Progress and Obstacles to Progress in the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Hempel, C.G., 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press. (Scholar)
- Hintikka, J., 1968, “The Varieties of Information and Scientific Explanation,” in: B. van Rootselaar and J.E. Staal (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science III. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 151-171. (Scholar)
- Howson, C. (ed.), 1976, Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences: The Critical Background to Modern Science, 1800–1905. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Hull, D.L., 1988, Science as a Process: Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Jonkisz, A., 2000, “On Relative Progress in Science,” in Jonkisz and Koj (2000), pp. 199–234. (Scholar)
- Jonkisz, A. and Koj, L. (eds.), 2000, On Comparing and Evaluating Scientific Theories. Amsterdam: Rodopi. (Scholar)
- Kemeny, J. and Oppenheim, P., 1956, “On Reduction.” Philosophical Studies 7, 6–19. (Scholar)
- Kitcher, P., 1993, The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Kleiner, S.A., 1993, The Logic of Discovery: A Theory of the Rationality of Scientific Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Krajewski, W., 1977, Correspondence Principle and the Growth of Knowledge. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- Kuhn, T.S., 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962. 2nd enlarged ed. (Scholar)
- –––, 1977, The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Kuipers, T., 2000, From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.), 1970, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Laudan, L., 1977, Progress and Its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- –––, 1984a, Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1984b, “Explaining the Success of Science: Beyond Epistemic Realism and Relativism,” in: J.T. Cushing, C.F. Delaney, and G.M. Gutting (eds.), Science and Reality. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 83–105. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, “Progress or Rationality? The Prospects for Normative Naturalism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 24, 19–31. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, Science and Relativism. Berkeley: The University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Laudan, L., et al., 1986, “Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research.” Synthese 69, 141–224. (Scholar)
- Leplin, J. (ed.), 1984, Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Levi, I., 1967, Gambling With Truth: An Essay on Induction and the Aims of Science. New York: Harper & Row. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1973. (Scholar)
- –––, 1980, The Enterprise of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985, “Messianic vs Myopic Realism,” in: P.D. Asquith and P. Kitcher (eds.), PSA 1984, vol. 2; East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 617–636. (Scholar)
- Martin, B.and Irvine, J., 1983, “Assessing Basic Research: Some Partial Indicators of Scientific Progress in Radio Astronomy.” Research Policy 12, 61–90. (Scholar)
- Moulines, C.U., 2000, “Is There Genuinely Scientific Progress?,” in: Jonkisz and Koj, 173–197. (Scholar)
- Mulkay, M., 1975, “Three Models of Scientific Development,” The Sociological Review 23, 509–526. (Scholar)
- Niiniluoto, I., 1980, “Scientific Progress.” Synthese 45, 427–464. (Scholar)
- –––, 1984, Is Science Progressive? Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, Truthlikeness. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995a, “Is There Progress in Science?,” in H. Stachowiak (ed.), Pragmatik, Handbuch pragmatischen Denkens, Band V, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, pp. 30–58. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995b, “Emergence of Scientific Specialties: Six Models,” in: W. Herfel et al. (eds.), Theories and Models in Scientific Processes. Amsterdam: Rodopi pp. 21–223. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Theory Change, Truthlikeness, and Belief Revision,” in: M. Suárez et al. (eds.), EPSA Epistemology and Methodology of Science. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 189–199. (Scholar)
- Niiniluoto, I. and Tuomela, R. (eds.), 1979, The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change. Acta Philosophica Fennica 30, Helsinki. (Scholar)
- Nisbet, R., 1980, History of the Idea of Progress. London: Heinemann. (Scholar)
- Nowak, L., 1980, The Structure of Idealization: Towards a Systematic Interpretation of the Marxian Idea of Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- Nowakowa, I. and Nowak, L., 2000, The Richness of Idealization, Amsterdam: Rodopi. (Scholar)
- Oddie, G., 1986, Likeness to Truth. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- Pearce, D., 1987, Roads to Commensurability. Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Pearce, D. and Rantala, V., 1984, “A Logical Study of the Correspondence Relation.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 13, 47–84. (Scholar)
- Pera, M., 1994, The Discourse of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Pitt, J.C., 1981, Pictures, Images, and Conceptual Change: An Analysis of Wilfrid Sellars' Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- –––, (ed.), 1985, Change and Progress in Modern Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- Popper, K., 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson. (Scholar)
- –––, 1963, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Hutchinson. (Scholar)
- –––, 1972, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2nd enlarged ed. 1979. (Scholar)
- Price, D. de Solla, 1963, Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
- Psillos, S., 1999, Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Putnam, H., 1975, Mind. Language, and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1978, Meaning and the Moral Sciences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Radnitzky, G.; Andersson, G. (eds.), 1978 Progress and Rationality in Science. Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel. (Scholar)
- –––, (eds.), 1979, The Structure and Development of Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- Radnitzky, G. and Bartley, W.W. III (eds.), 1987, Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois. (Scholar)
- Rantala, V., 2002, Explanatory Translation: Beyond the Kuhnian Model of Conceptual Change. Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Rescher, N., 1977, Methodological Pragmatism. Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- –––, 1978m, Scientific Progress: A Philosophical Essay on the Economics of Research in Natural Science. Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- –––, 1984, The Limits of Science. Berkeley: The University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Rowbottom, D. P., 2008, “N-rays and the Semantic View of Progress.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39, 277–278. (Scholar)
- Sarton, G., 1936, The Study of the History of Science. Harvard: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Schäfer, W. (ed.), 1983, Finalization in Science: The Social Orientation of Scientific Progress. Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Scheibe, E., 1976, “Conditions of Progress and Comparability of Theories,” in R.S. Cohen et al. (ed.), Essays on Memory of Imre Lakatos, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 547–568. (Scholar)
- Sintonen, M., 1984, The Pragmatics of Scientific Explanation. Acta Philosophica Fennica 37. Helsinki. (Scholar)
- Smith, P., 1981, Realism and the Progress of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Stegmüller, W., 1976, The Structure and Dynamics of Theories. New York-Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer-Verlag. (Scholar)
- Suppe, F. (ed.), 1977, The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
- Toulmin, S., 1972, Human Understanding, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Tuomela, R., 1985, Science, Action, and Reality. Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- van Fraassen, B., 1980, The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Wachbroit, R., 1986, “Progress: Metaphysical and Otherwise.” Philosophy of Science 53, 354–371. (Scholar)
Generated Thu Apr 25 23:51:02 2013
