UnityGPT vs. ChatGPT: A Comparative Review for Frontier Scientists

Journal of Scientific Exploration 37 (3) (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Artificial intelligence tools based on Large Language Models (LLMs), such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, are revolutionizing how we process and synthesize information. However, these tools can be anemic when applied to niche or unconventional domains, such as parapsychology. This is due to the fact that the input content used to train these LLMs draws predominately from mainstream internet sources (e.g., Wikipedia), and thus, the corresponding outputs inherit various biases surrounding heterodox subjects. This review introduces UnityGPT, a custom AI tool provided with a vast array of unconventional research from a plurality of disciplines, intended for use as a primary research tool in the frontier sciences. The article summarizes the technology approach of both ChatGPT and UnityGPT, and their relative strengths and weaknesses.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Large Language Models and Biorisk.William D’Alessandro, Harry R. Lloyd & Nathaniel Sharadin - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):115-118.
The Epistemological Danger of Large Language Models.Elise Li Zheng & Sandra Soo-Jin Lee - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):102-104.
Bias Optimizers.Damien P. Williams - 2023 - American Scientist 111 (4):204-207.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-22

Downloads
5 (#847,061)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references