Homeomeric Lines in Greek Mathematics

Science in Context 23 (1):1-37 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ArgumentThis article presents ancient documents on the subject of homeomeric lines. On the basis of such documents, the article reconstructs a definition of the notion as well as a proof of the result, which is left unproved in extant sources, that there are only three homeomeric lines: the straight line, the circumference, and the cylindrical helix. A point of particular historiographic interest is that homeomeric lines were the only class of lines defined directly as the extension of a mathematical property, a move that is unparalleled in Greek mathematics. The far-reaching connections between mathematical homeomery and key issues in the ancient cosmological debate are extensively discussed here. An analysis of its relevance as a foundational theme will be presented in a companion paper in a future issue of Science in Context.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
30 (#132,620)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Euclid’s Common Notions and the Theory of Equivalence.Vincenzo De Risi - 2020 - Foundations of Science 26 (2):301-324.
Uses of construction in problems and theorems in Euclid’s Elements I–VI.Nathan Sidoli - 2018 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 72 (4):403-452.
The Parthenon and liberal education.Geoff Lehman - 2018 - Albany: SUNY Press. Edited by Michael Weinman.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A history of Greek philosophy.William Keith Chambers Guthrie - 1962 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
A History of Greek Philosophy.W. K. C. Guthrie - 1969 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 27 (2):214-216.
A History of Greek Philosophy.K. W. Harrington - 1978 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (3):431-433.

View all 6 references / Add more references