Editorial introduction

Angelaki 10 (2):1 – 12 (2005)
It pertains to a problem which we cannot ignore today, namely that of thinking the place of science in the context of the entirety of our experience, whether in order to maintain a critique of the former, as has been done after Bergson (and in ways other than his own), for example by Deleuze or Merleau-Ponty; or to continue to deepen it, as has been done after Brunschvicg (and in ways other than his own) for example by Bachelard or Cavaillès. Without revisiting these two doctrines, we can understand neither the problem nor the way in which it continues to problematise the philosophical enterprises that have succeeded it, up to the present day.1
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09697250500417076
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,470
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

8 ( #467,982 of 1,925,557 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #418,152 of 1,925,557 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.