- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Socially responsible mutual fund exit decisions
Business Ethics: A European Review 29 (1):82-97 (2019)
Abstract
Business Ethics: A European Review, EarlyView.Author Profiles
My notes
Similar books and articles
Socially responsible downsizing: Comparing family and non‐family firms.Maria J. Sanchez-Bueno, Fernando Muñoz-Bullón & Jose I. Galan - 2019 - Business Ethics: A European Review 29 (1):35-55.
Socially responsible consumption in Russia: Testing the theory of planned behavior and the moderating role of trust.Irina Petrovskaya & Fazli Haleem - 2020 - Business Ethics: A European Review 30 (1):38-53.
Law‐abiding organizational climates in developing countries: The role of institutional factors and socially responsible organizational practices.Shoeb Mohammad & Bryan W. Husted - 2019 - Business Ethics: A European Review 28 (4):476-493.
How Norway’s sovereign wealth fund negative screening affects firms’ value and behaviour.Khalil Al Ayoubi & Geoffroy Enjolras - 2020 - Business Ethics: A European Review 30 (1):19-37.
Blockchain and business ethics.Claus Dierksmeier & Peter Seele - 2019 - Business Ethics: A European Review 29 (2):348-359.
Practicing management wisely.Matthias P. Hühn, André Habisch, Edwin M. Hartman & Alejo José G. Sison - 2020 - Business Ethics: A European Review 29 (S1):1-5.
The ethical consequences of “going dark”.Richard A. Spinello - 2020 - Business Ethics: A European Review 30 (1):116-126.
The digital transformation of work: A relational view.Carlos Rodriguez-Lluesma, Pablo García-Ruiz & Javier Pinto-Garay - 2020 - Business Ethics: A European Review 30 (1):157-167.
An integrative ethical approach to leader favoritism.Inju Yang, Sven Horak & Nada K. Kakabadse - 2020 - Business Ethics: A European Review 30 (1):90-101.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-11-11
Downloads
12 (#1,115,280)
6 months
6 (#587,658)
2019-11-11
Downloads
12 (#1,115,280)
6 months
6 (#587,658)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
References found in this work
Financial performance of socially responsible investing : what have we learned? A meta‐analysis.Christophe Revelli & Jean-Laurent Viviani - 2014 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (2):158-185.
Stock picking, market timing and style differences between socially responsible and conventional pension funds: evidence from the United Kingdom.Luis Ferruz, Fernando Muñoz & Maria Vargas - 2010 - Business Ethics: A European Review 19 (4):408-422.
What is Different about Socially Responsible Funds? A Holdings-Based Analysis.Jacquelyn E. Humphrey, Geoffrey J. Warren & Junyan Boon - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 138 (2):263-277.
Does socially responsible mutual fund performance vary over the business cycle? New insights on the effect of idiosyncratic SR features.Juan Carlos Matallín‐Sáez, Amparo Soler‐Domínguez, Diego Víctor de Mingo‐López & Emili Tortosa‐Ausina - 2018 - Business Ethics: A European Review 28 (1):71-98.
Environmental Mutual Funds: Financial Performance and Managerial Abilities.Fernando Muñoz, Maria Vargas & Isabel Marco - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 124 (4):551-569.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-x7cz5 uwo