- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Justification and Application of Norms
Ratio Juris 6 (2):157-170 (1993)
Abstract
According to the author there is no doubt that one has to distinguish between the justification and the application of norms. Problems are seen only to arise if one asks what exactly the distinction is and which consequences have to be drawn from it. Recently, Klaus Günther, in particular, has searched for this distinction and connected it with far‐reaching conclusions concerning the theory of norms, arguments, and morals. His theses are the object of the author's considerations.My notes
Similar books and articles
A Normative Conception of Coherence for a Discursive Theory of Legal Justification.Klaus Günther - 1989 - Ratio Juris 2 (2):155-166.
The Sense of Appropriateness: Application Discourses in Morality and Law.John Farrell (ed.) - 1993 - State University of New York Press.
Far Beyond from Norms, Distinguishing Rules and Principles.Julio Pinheiro Faro Homem de Siqueira - 2011 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 97 (2):198-206.
From Worked-out Practice to Justified Norms by Producing a Reflective Equilibrium.Susanne Hahn - 2016 - Analyse & Kritik 38 (2):339-370.
Resuscitation of a Phantom? On Robert Alexy’s Latest Attempt to Save His Concept of Principle.Ralf Poscher - 2020 - Ratio Juris 33 (2):134-149.
On the Tension between Moral Autonomy and the Rational Justification of Norms.Jan–R. Sieckmann - 2003 - Ratio Juris 16 (1):105-122.
Equality and Singularity in Justification and Application Discourses.Matthias Fritsch - 2010 - European Journal of Political Theory 9 (3):328-346.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-11
Downloads
72 (#79,783)
6 months
11 (#1,140,922)
2010-09-11
Downloads
72 (#79,783)
6 months
11 (#1,140,922)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
How (far) can rationality be naturalized?Gerd Gigerenzer & Thomas Sturm - 2012 - Synthese 187 (1):243-268.
Jumps and logic in the law.Aleksander Peczenik - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):297-329.
Basic Rights and Democracy in Jurgen Habermas's Procedural Paradigm of the Law.Robert Alexy - 1994 - Ratio Juris 7 (2):227-238.
Moral Cognitivism and Legal Positivism in Habermas's and Kan't Philosophy of Law.Delamar José Volpato Dutra & Nythamar de Oliveira - 2017 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 16 (3):533-546.
References found in this work
The Concept of Coherence and Its Significance for Discursive Rationality.Robert Alexy & Aleksander Peczenik - 1990 - Ratio Juris 3 (s1):130-147.
Der Sinn für Angemessenheit.Klaus Günther - 1990 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 44 (3):491-495.
Prima facie obligations.John Searle - 1978 - In Joseph Raz (ed.), Practical reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 81--81.
Ein normativer Begriff der Kohärenz für eine Theorie der juristischen Argumentation”.Klaus Günther - 1989 - Rechtstheorie 20 (1989):163-190.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo