Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):95-95 (1999)
We argue that if a different definition of sentence complexity is adopted and processing capacity is assessed in a way that is consistent with that definition, then the Caplan & Waters distinction between interpretive versus postinterpretive processing is unnecessary insofar that it applies to the thematic role assignment in relative-clause sentences.
|Keywords||C1 780108 Behavioural and cognitive sciences 380302 Linguistic Processes (incl. Speech Production and Comprehension)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
'Testimonial' and the Formalistic Definition - the Case for an 'Accusatorial' Fix.Robert P. Mosteller - manuscript -
Modality and What is Said.Jason Stanley - 2003 - In John Hawthorne (ed.), Language and Mind. Blackwell. pp. 321--44.
Agrammatic Sentence Processing: Severity, Complexity, and Priming.Herman H. J. Kolk & Robert J. Hartsuiker - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):39-40.
Communication by Ramsey-Sentence Clause.Herbert G. Bohnert - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (4):341-347.
The Complexity of Analytic Tableaux.Noriko H. Arai, Toniann Pitassi & Alasdair Urquhart - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3):777 - 790.
The Influence of Clause Order, Congruency, and Probability on the Processing of Conditionals.Matthew Haigh & Andrew J. Stewart - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 17 (4):402 - 423.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #173,782 of 2,065,369 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #84,899 of 2,065,369 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.