Complexity effects are found in all relative-clause sentence forms

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):95-95 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that if a different definition of sentence complexity is adopted and processing capacity is assessed in a way that is consistent with that definition, then the Caplan & Waters distinction between interpretive versus postinterpretive processing is unnecessary insofar that it applies to the thematic role assignment in relative-clause sentences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Working memory and sentence comprehension: Whose burden of proof?Arthur Wingfield - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):113-114.
Problems with plausibility and alternatives to working memory.Neal J. Pearlmutter - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):109-109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
50 (#309,908)

6 months
9 (#437,668)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references