The stimulus-reinforcer hypothesis of behavioral momentum: Some methodological considerations

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):90-91 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary focuses on the stimulus-reinforcer hypothesis of resistance to change. The overall context of reinforcement can account for resistance to extinction. There are ways to systematically test the hypothesis that Pavlovian contingencies account for the behavioral “mass” of discriminated operant behavior.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Behavioral momentum and Pavlovian conditioning.Randolph C. Grace & John A. Nevin - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):695-697.
The uncertain domain of resistance to change.Ben A. Williams & Matthew C. Bell - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):116-117.
Behavioral momentum and the law of effect.John A. Nevin & Randolph C. Grace - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):73-90.
Stimulus factors in addiction.John A. Nevin - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):590-591.
Preference and resistance to change do not always covary.Masaharu Takahashi - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):112-113.
Neuroleptics and operant behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis.Roy A. Wise - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):39-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#598,685)

6 months
4 (#1,005,098)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references