Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):312-313 (2000)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00678.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,901
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Neonatal Euthanasia: Why Require Parental Consent? [REVIEW]Jacob M. Appel - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (4):477-482.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ethics: English High Court Orders Separation of Conjoined Twins.Jacob M. Appel - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):312-318.
One Into Two Will Not Go: Conceptualising Conjoined Twins.M. Q. Bratton - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):279-285.
Ethical Reflections on the Separation of Conjoined Twins.Gerald Gleeson - 2001 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 6 (4):1.
The Maltese Conjoined Twins. Hubris in the Court.Lori P. Knowles - 2001 - Hastings Center Report 31 (1):50.


Added to PP index

Total views
19 ( #550,994 of 2,439,115 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #434,440 of 2,439,115 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes