Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 4 (1):10-15 (2011)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Traditionally, the key features of the family system of Eating Disorders have been considered those originally outlined by Minuchin in his description of the "psychosomatic" family patterns of interaction. This controlled study tests two of the principal characteristics of Minuchin's model, namely enmeshment and rigidity, operationalised as extreme cohesion and low adaptability. Perceived and desired cohesion and adaptability, measured with the FACES III, were compared between 30 clinical families and 30 non-clinical families. Differences across ED family members were also considered, as well as differences between ED symptomatological subgroups . High cohesion scores were found in ED families, but similar findings were also reported in control families. Cohesion scores were significantly higher in restricting anorectics than in patients with bulimic symptoms. Adaptability was normal in both ED and control families. This study does not support Minuchin's observations on family enmeshment and rigidity. Although high levels of cohesion were found in ED families, the same relational pattern was found in the control families, suggesting that a tendency to a hyper-involvement of family members might be "normal" in some sociocultural contexts
|
Keywords | anorexia bulimia family structure family therapy systemic therapy |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Patient in the Family and the Family in the Patient.Barry Hoffmaster & Wayne Weston - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
Cohen-Stable Families of Subsets of Integers.Miloš S. Kurilić - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):257-270.
Rethinking the Value of Families.Yonathan Reshef - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):130-150.
Using the Family Covenant in Planning End-of-Life Care: Obligations and Promises of Patients, Families, and Physicians.David J. Doukas - unknown
Moral Education in Family Life: The Effects of Diversity.J. Mark Halstead - 1999 - Journal of Moral Education 28 (3):265-281.
The Best Interest of Children and the Basis of Family Policy: The Issue of Reproductive Caring Units.Christian Munthe & Thomas Hartvigsson - 2012 - In Daniela Cutas & Sarah Chan (eds.), Families: Beyond the Nuclear Ideal. Bloomsbury Academic.
Design as a Tool for Family Evolutionary Guidance.Sabrina Brahms - 2002 - World Futures 58 (5 & 6):425 – 432.
The Role of Family of Origin in Physicians Referred to a CME Course.Charles P. Samenow, Scott T. Yabiku, Marine Ghulyan, Betsy Williams & William Swiggart - 2012 - HEC Forum 24 (2):115-126.
Analytic Countably Splitting Families.Otmar Spinas - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (1):101-117.
Corporate Social Performance in Family Firms.Sara A. Morris - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:154-159.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-09-25
Total views
467 ( #15,086 of 2,421,636 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
65 ( #11,461 of 2,421,636 )
2011-09-25
Total views
467 ( #15,086 of 2,421,636 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
65 ( #11,461 of 2,421,636 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads