Self-defense : the imminence requirement

In Leslie Green & Brian Leiter (eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law. New York: Oxford University Press (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defending Fundamental Requirements of Practical Reason.David Alm - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:77-102.
The actus reus requirement: A qualified defense.Michael Gorr - 1991 - Criminal Justice Ethics 10 (1):11-17.
Terminal sedation and the "imminence condition".V. Cellarius - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (2):69-72.
Regularity reformulated.Weng Hong Tang - 2012 - Episteme 9 (4):329-343.
Intention, belief, and instrumental rationality.Michael Bratman - 2009 - In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press. pp. 13--36.
Rationality and total evidence.Andrew McLaughlin - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (2):271-278.
Proportionality and Self-Defense.Suzanne Uniacke - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (3):253-272.
Is the Enkratic Principle a Requirement of Rationality?Andrew Reisner - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (4):436-462.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-24

Downloads
4 (#1,426,245)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcia Baron
Indiana University, Bloomington

Citations of this work

Moral Excuse to the Pacifist's Rescue.Blake Hereth - 2023 - Journal of Pacifism and Nonviolence:1-32.
Moral sequencing and intervening to prevent harm.Benjamin David Costello - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Birmingham

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references