Listening to claims of structural injustice

Angelaki 24 (4):120-135 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Listening appears as elusive as it is crucial to democratic life, particularly in conditions of structural injustice. Dominant groups benefit from histories and habits of inattention and, when enlisted, common responses of denial, defensiveness, and resentment. What lies behind this pervasive and persistent failure to listen to claims of structural injustice by more advantaged groups, and what does this mean for democratic engagement? This paper addresses this question via three interventions: first, it develops a novel account of listening that reveals why listening to claims of structural injustice often proves difficult. Second, it examines how inhabiting positions of relative advantage shapes whether and how people listen to such claims. Finally, it explores the implications these challenges have for the design of democratic processes that seek to engage advantaged groups regarding structural injustice. To develop this account, I draw together current scholarship regarding listening and structural injustice with original fieldwork of recent and current efforts to engage more advantaged communities regarding a specific form of structural injustice: specifically, interviews and observation of the ten organizations across Aotearoa New Zealand most active in efforts to engage communities regarding socio-economic inequality in the country.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,549

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Structural Injustice and the Place of Attachment.Lea Ypi - 2017 - Journal of Practical Ethics 5 (1):1-21.
Structural injustice and the significance of the past.Seung Hyun Song - 2023 - European Journal of Political Theory 22 (4):647-656.
Structural Injustice and the Duties of the Privileged.Zsolt Kapelner - 2021 - Social Theory and Practice 47 (2):247-264.
Structural Injustice and Massively Shared Obligations.Anne Schwenkenbecher - 2021 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (1):1-16.
Acting Together to Address Structural Injustice: A Deliberative Mini-Public Proposal.Ting-an Lin - forthcoming - In Kevin Walton, Sadurski Wojciech & Coel Kirkby (eds.), Responding to Injustice. Routledge.
Structural injustice.Maeve McKeown - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (7):e12757.


Added to PP

37 (#427,979)

6 months
12 (#312,960)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Structural injustice.Maeve McKeown - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (7):e12757.
Emotions and the everyday: Ambivalence, power and resistance.Kate Schick - 2019 - Journal of International Political Theory 15 (2):261-268.

Add more citations

References found in this work

White Ignorance.Charles Mills - 2007 - In Shannon Sullivan & Nancy Tuana (eds.), Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. State Univ of New York Pr. pp. 11-38.
Epistemologies of ignorance: Three types.Linda Martín Alcoff - 2007 - In Shannon Sullivan & Nancy Tuana (eds.), Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. State Univ of New York Pr.
Feminism and the public sphere.Iris Marion Young - 1997 - Constellations 3 (3):340-363.
[Book review] the racial contract. [REVIEW]Charles W. Mills - 1997 - Social Theory and Practice 25 (1):155-160.

View all 10 references / Add more references