Authors
Lukas Beck
Cambridge University
Abstract
Functionalism about kinds is still the dominant style of thought in the special sciences, like economics, psychology, and biology. Generally construed, functionalism is the view that states or processes can be individuated based on what role they play rather than what they are constituted of or realized by. Recently, Weiskopf has posited a reformulation of functionalism on the model-based approach to explanation. We refer to this reformulation as ‘new functionalism’. In this paper, we seek to defend new functionalism and to recast it in light of the concrete explanatory aims of the special sciences. In particular, we argue that the assessment of the explanatory legitimacy of a functional kind needs to take into account the explanatory purpose of the model in which the functional kind is employed. We aim at demonstrating this by appealing to model-based explanations from the social and behavioral sciences. Specifically, we focus on preferences and signals as functional kinds. Our argument is intended to have the double impact of deflecting criticisms against new functionalism from the perspective of mechanistic decomposition while also expanding the scope of new functionalism to encompass the social and behavioral sciences.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s13194-021-00420-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thinking About Mechanisms.Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1-25.

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytic Functionalism Without Representational Functionalism.Terence Horgan - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):51-51.
Overlooking the Resources of Functionalism?Zoltan Jakab - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):957-957.
Why Asymmetries in Color Space Cannot Save Functionalism.Jonathan Cohen - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):950-950.
An Inconsistency in Functionalism.George Bealer - 1978 - Synthese 38 (July):333-372.
How is Block’s Central Argument Against Functionalism?zg ma - 2018 - Asian Research Journal of Arts and Social Sciences 5 (1):01-04.
Functionalism and Inverted Spectra.David J. Cole - 1990 - Synthese 82 (2):207-22.
Goldman has Not Defeated Folk Functionalism.James H. Fetzer - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):42-43.
What is Functionalism?Ned Block - 1996 - In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), [Book Chapter]. MacMillan.
Assessing Functional Explanations in the Social Sciences.Harold Kincaid - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:341-354.
Symposium on Mechanisms in Mind.Carl Gillett - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:1-2.
Symposium on Mechanisms in Mind.Carl Gillett - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:1-2.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-11-02

Total views
2 ( #1,442,829 of 2,499,415 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,169 of 2,499,415 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes