Collecting birds: the importance of moral debate

Bird Conservation International 7 (4):357-361 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent article in this journal, Remsen attacked moral objections to killing birds for museum collections, objections that are frequently raised by the general public and scientific community alike. The only grounds for moral objections against killing birds that Remsen considers and rejects are reverence for all life or personal, that is sentimental reasons. What Remsen ignores is avian sentience and the moral imperative of respecting it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Targeted Killing.Daniel Statman - 2004 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 5 (1):179-198.
Vital Conflicts, Direct Killing, and Justice.Martin Rhonheimer - 2011 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 11 (3):509-530.
Killing, wrongness, and equality.Carlos Soto - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (2):543-559.
Work and play as moral categories.Shai M. Dromi - 2022 - Theory and Society 51 (6):893-906.
Sentience, Rationality, and Moral Status: A Further Reply to Hsiao.Stephen Puryear - 2016 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (4):697-704.
Impartial Reasons, Moral Demands.Brian McElwee - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):457-466.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-30

Downloads
7 (#1,406,036)

6 months
6 (#700,231)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrzej Elzanowski
Warsaw University

Citations of this work

The Case for Welfare Biology.Asher A. Soryl, Mike R. King, Andrew J. Moore & Philip J. Seddon - 2021 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (2):1-25.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references