A Defence of Robust Idealism in Political Philosophy

Moral Philosophy and Politics 10 (2):249-266 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this contribution, I defend a robust model of political idealism, making the case for such an approach to both the theory and practice of politics. On this view, not only in framing a political philosophy but also in putting forward policy proposals and institutional designs, we need not think about feasibility as an overriding, make-or-break criterion for evaluating the soundness of that theory or proposal, neither of which loses its point simply because it is deemed to be unlikely to be implemented. Feasibility, in other terms, cannot be taken as the only standard, or even as the main standard, on which basis to assess the practical worth of a political strategy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-10

Downloads
23 (#670,463)

6 months
9 (#437,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Replies to Critics (on Utopophobia).David Estlund - 2023 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 2023 (2):321-336.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Realism in Normative Political Theory.Enzo Rossi & Matt Sleat - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (10):689-701.
Justice for hedgehogs.Ronald Dworkin - 2011 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Philosophy and Real Politics.Raymond Geuss - 2008 - Princeton University Press.
Being realistic and demanding the impossible.Enzo Rossi - 2019 - Constellations 26 (4):638-652.

View all 39 references / Add more references