Commentary: “An Evaluation of Universal Grammar and the Phonological Mind”—UG Is Still a Viable Hypothesis

Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Universal grammar? Or prerequisites for natural language?Adele E. Goldberg - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):522-523.
Universal grammar and the critical age.Julia Herschensohn - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):611-612.
How Statistical Learning Can Play Well with Universal Grammar.Lisa S. Pearl - 2021 - In Nicholas Allott, Terje Lohndal & Georges Rey (eds.), A Companion to Chomsky. Wiley. pp. 267–286.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-24

Downloads
5 (#1,562,727)

6 months
2 (#1,448,741)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The evolution of linguistic rules.Matthew Spike - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (6):887-904.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Core knowledge.Elizabeth S. Spelke - 2000 - American Psychologist 55 (11):1233-1243.
Core knowledge.Elizabeth S. Spelke & Katherine D. Kinzler - 2007 - Developmental Science 10 (1):89-96.
Initial knowledge: six suggestions.Elizabeth Spelke - 1994 - Cognition 50 (1-3):431-445.

View all 20 references / Add more references