The present study intends to demonstrate that there is no logical-formal inconsistency in the Christian Trinity. However, the demonstration requires specific tools, other than those of classical logic. There are many older or newer attempts that try to remove the thesis of the inconsistency of the Christian Trinity. There is often a call for mathematical tools. As far as we are concerned, we will appeal to co -inherence and the nesting relationships specific to the Christian Trinity, as they appear especially in Augustine’s work. We advance the hypothesis that Augustine's metaphor "heaven of heavens" has a foundational role in the logical plane of explanation. In this sense, Augustine points out that in the "heaven of heavens", reason does not know "in part", but it knows everything suddenly, entirely, as in a totality. This totality with a founding role functions as a principle, which we can call the principle of free totality. But the co -belonging of entities in the free and founding totality also expresses co -inherence. Divine persons are an emanation of God. That is why we are talking about co -inherence. The "co" particle points out that the starting point is in the free totality of God, and that this totality logically precedes the rest of the process. Thus, we can consider the term "the Christian Trinity" as a nested term, as co -habitation. The totality of God is not a generalization in the spirit of the Aristotelian abstraction, but rather a particularity, a "personalization" that does not cancel the individual, but it highlights in instantiation. In this sense, the Christian God is not an abstraction, but a divine Being in three persons, in whom He instantiates. The logic of this process is the one of vagueness.
Keywords relation of nesting, Christian Trinity, logic of the Trinity, free totality, relation of co-inherence, logic of vague
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,242
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Plural Logic.Alex Oliver & Timothy Smiley - 2013 - Oxford University Press UK.
Peirce's Theory of Signs.T. L. Short - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
On the Logic of Religious Terms.Ioan Biris - 2009 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 8 (22):63-88.
Critique of Religion and Philosophy.Julian N. Hartt - 1961 - Philosophical Review 70 (2):286.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Cambridge Companion to the Trinity.Peter C. Phan (ed.) - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Augustine and the Trinity.Lewis Ayres - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
The Trinity.Michael C. Rea - 2009 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press. pp. 403--429.
Inherence and Denomination in the Trinity.Paul Thom - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (2):139--153.
A Trinity on a Trinity on a Trinity.John Zeis - 1993 - Sophia 32 (1):45 - 55.
Trinity, Temporality, and Open Theism.Richard Rice - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):321-328.
God, Emperor and Relative Identity.A. P. Martinich - 1979 - Franciscan Studies 39 (1):180-191.
The Christian God.Richard Swinburne - 1994 - Oxford University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
32 ( #337,648 of 2,444,857 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,287 of 2,444,857 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes