Axiomathes:1-18 (forthcoming)

This article discusses the quiddity of the empty set from its epistemological and linguistic aspects. It consists of four parts. The first part compares the concept of nihil privativum and the empty set in terms of representability, arguing the empty set can be treated as a negative and formal concept. It is argued that, unlike Frege’s definition of zero, the quantitative negation with a full scope is what enables us to represent the empty set conceptually without committing to an antinomy. The second part examines the type and scope of the negation in the concept of nihil privativum and the empty set. In the third part the empty set is interpreted as a rigid abstract general term. The uniqueness of the empty set is explained via a widened version of Kripke’s notion of rigidity. The fourth part proposes a construction for the pure singleton, comparing it with Zermelo’s conception of singletons with the Ur-elements. It is argued that the proposed construction does not face the criterion and ontological inflation problems. The first conclusion of the article is that the empty set can be construed as a negative, formal and unique abstract general term, with quantitative negation full in scope. The second conclusion is that the pure singleton constructed out of the empty set construed in this way overcomes the criterion and ontological inflation problems.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10516-021-09571-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,819
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

From Emptiness to Hunger.G. J. Bednar - 2016 - Renascence 68 (3):194-209.
Mathematics is Megethology.David K. Lewis - 1993 - Philosophia Mathematica 1 (1):3-23.
Empty Names and Reference.Anna Bjurman - 2003 - Dissertation, Lund University
Visual Field and Empty Space.Kristjan Laasik - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy (published online):403-411.
Is Empty Spacetime a Physical Thing?Diego Meschini & Markku Lehto - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (8):1193-1216.
Descriptivism, Scope, and Apparently Empty Names.Andrew Cullison & Ben Caplan - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (2):283-288.
First Order Logic with Empty Structures.Mohamed A. Amer - 1989 - Studia Logica 48 (2):169 - 177.
Empty Self.[author unknown] - 2005 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:233-268.
Empty Names and Pragmatic Millianism.Seyed N. Mousavian - 2014 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):49-58.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,114,597 of 2,463,235 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,456 of 2,463,235 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes