- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Understanding the replication crisis as a base rate fallacy
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:000-000 (2018)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Understanding the Replication Crisis as a Base Rate Fallacy.Alexander Bird - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (4):965-993.
Is the replication crisis a base-rate fallacy?Bengt Autzen - 2021 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 42 (5):233-243.
When a Crisis Becomes an Opportunity: The Role of Replications in Making Better Theories.Jane Suilin Lavelle - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (4):965-986.
Review of Alexander Bird: Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW]P. Lipton - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):163-167.
The no miracles argument and the base rate fallacy.Leah Henderson - 2017 - Synthese 194 (4):1295-1302.
Evolving Null hypotheses and the base rate fallacy: A functional interpretation of scientific myth.Brian J. Gibbs - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):776-777.
Kuhnian theory-choice and virtue convergence: Facing the base rate fallacy.Samuel Schindler - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 64:30-37.
First things first: What is a base rate?Clark McCauley - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):33-34.
If the base rate fallacy is a fallacy, does it matter how frequently it is committed?Jonathan E. Adler - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):774-775.
Alexander Bird, Philosophy of Science.M. X. Ashooh - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (1):83-85.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-08-14
Downloads
6 (#1,485,580)
6 months
188 (#16,804)
2018-08-14
Downloads
6 (#1,485,580)
6 months
188 (#16,804)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The new demarcation problem.Bennett Holman & Torsten Wilholt - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):211-220.
Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms.Uwe Peters - 2023 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 74 (3):713-738.
The role of replication in psychological science.Samuel C. Fletcher - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-19.
The New Worries about Science.Janet A. Kourany - 2022 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):227-245.
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.
Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error.Gilbert Harman - 1999 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1999):315-331.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-dxklk uwo