Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):776-777 (1997)

Brian J. Gibbs
University of Chicago (PhD)
The meaning of an experimental result depends on the experiment's conceptual backdrop, particularly its null hypothesis. This observation provides the basis for a functional interpretation of belief in the base rate fallacy. On this interpretation, if the base rate fallacy is to be labelled a “myth,” then it should be recognized that this label is not necessarily a disparaging one.
Keywords scientific myth  functional myth  judgment fallacy  base rate  epistimology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x97241646
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

"Descartes' Myth" and Professor Ryle's Fallacy.Dickinson S. Miller - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (April):270-279.
Pragmatically Before Ecologically Valid Tasks.Laura Macchi - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):778-779.
Is Frequentist Testing Vulnerable to the Base-Rate Fallacy?Aris Spanos - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (4):565-583.
Base Rates and Randomness.Ranald R. Macdonald - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):778-778.
Chow's Defense of Null-Hypothesis Testing: Too Traditional?Robert W. Frick - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):199-199.


Added to PP index

Total views
104 ( #105,075 of 2,455,420 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,315 of 2,455,420 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes