Authors |
|
Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Attacking Character: Ad Hominem Argument and Virtue Epistemology.Heather Battaly - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (4):361-390.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Commentary on Patrick Bondy, “Bias in Legitimate Ad Hominem Arguments”.Andrew Aberdein - 2016 - Argumentation, Objectivity and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18–21, 2016.
Ad Hominem Arguments and Intelligent Design: Reply to Koperski.Christopher A. Pynes - 2012 - Zygon 47 (2):289-297.
Commentary On: Patrick Bondy's "The Epistemic Approach to Argument Evaluation: Virtues, Beliefs, Commitments".Bruce Russell - unknown
Commentary on Jean Goodwin, "Objectivity in Controversial Science Communication: A Case Study of Kevin Folta".Patrick Bondy - unknown
Attacking Authority.Matthews Steve - 2011 - Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics 13 (2):59-70.
It's All Very Well for You to Talk! Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Douglas Walton - 1993 - Informal Logic 15 (2).
Take My Advice—I Am Not Following It: Ad Hominem Arguments as Legitimate Rebuttals to Appeals to Authority.Moti Mizrahi - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (4):435-456.
Wer Europa Sagt-- Essays Und Ehrungen von Und Für Franois Bondy.Iso Camartin & Francois Bondy - 1995
The Rejection of Testimony and the Normative Recommendation of Non-Fallacious 'Ad Hominem' Arguments Based on Hume's 'Of Miracles' and Canadian Law.Joel M. Buenting - 2005 - Auslegung 27 (2):1 - 16.
Motives Still Don't Matter: Reply to Pynes.Jeffrey Koperski & Andrés Ruiz - 2012 - Zygon 47 (4):662-665.
Valid Ad Hominem Arguments in Philosophy: Johnstone's Metaphilosophical Informal Logic.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).
Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument; Ad Hominem Arguments; One-Sided Arguments. A Dialectical Analysis of Bias. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (4):305-313.
Postscript: Accounting for Belief Bias in a Mental Model Framework--No Problem for Whom?Alan Garnham & Jane V. Oakhill - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (2):517-518.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2016-12-20
Total views
3 ( #1,293,751 of 2,421,247 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #351,589 of 2,421,247 )
2016-12-20
Total views
3 ( #1,293,751 of 2,421,247 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #351,589 of 2,421,247 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads