scholar.uwindsor.ca

More download options

Reply to Commentary on “Patrick Bondy, Bias in Legitimate Ad Hominem Arguments”

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Export citation

Formatted text (new window)

Plain text (new window)

BibTeX (new window)

Plain text (copy to clipboard)

BibTeX (copy to clipboard)

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Options

Mark as duplicate

Find it on Scholar

Request removal from index

Revision history

Author's Profile

Wichita State University

Categories

Informal Logic in Logic and Philosophy of Logic

Keywords

Download options

PhilArchive

Upload a copy of this work Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-20

Downloads
5 (#1,212,940)

6 months
1 (#386,016)

Historical graph of downloads

How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wichita State University

Categories

Informal Logic in Logic and Philosophy of Logic

Keywords

References found in this work

Virtue in Argument.Andrew Aberdein - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (2):165-179.

Attacking Character: Ad Hominem Argument and Virtue Epistemology.Heather Battaly - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (4):361-390.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Commentary on Patrick Bondy, “Bias in Legitimate Ad Hominem Arguments”.Andrew Aberdein - 2016 - Argumentation, Objectivity and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18–21, 2016.

Bias in Legitimate Ad Hominem Arguments.Bondy Patrick - unknown

Ad Hominem Arguments and Intelligent Design: Reply to Koperski.Christopher A. Pynes - 2012 - Zygon 47 (2):289-297.

Commentary On: Patrick Bondy's "The Epistemic Approach to Argument Evaluation: Virtues, Beliefs, Commitments".Bruce Russell - unknown

Commentary on Jean Goodwin, "Objectivity in Controversial Science Communication: A Case Study of Kevin Folta".Patrick Bondy - unknown

Attacking Authority.Matthews Steve - 2011 - Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics 13 (2):59-70.

It's All Very Well for You to Talk! Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Douglas Walton - 1993 - Informal Logic 15 (2).

Take My Advice—I Am Not Following It: Ad Hominem Arguments as Legitimate Rebuttals to Appeals to Authority.Moti Mizrahi - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (4):435-456.

Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony.Audrey Yap - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):97-109.

Wer Europa Sagt-- Essays Und Ehrungen von Und Für Franois Bondy.François Bondy - 1995 - Hanser Gardner Publications.

The Rejection of Testimony and the Normative Recommendation of Non-Fallacious 'Ad Hominem' Arguments Based on Hume's 'Of Miracles' and Canadian Law.Joel M. Buenting - 2005 - Auslegung 27 (2):1 - 16.

Motives Still Don't Matter: Reply to Pynes.Jeffrey Koperski & Andrés Ruiz - 2012 - Zygon 47 (4):662-665.

Valid Ad Hominem Arguments in Philosophy: Johnstone's Metaphilosophical Informal Logic.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).

Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument; Ad Hominem Arguments; One-Sided Arguments. A Dialectical Analysis of Bias. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (4):305-313.

Postscript: Accounting for Belief Bias in a Mental Model Framework--No Problem for Whom?Alan Garnham & Jane V. Oakhill - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (2):517-518.