Aeschylus, Choephori, 61–65

Classical Quarterly 7 (3-4):143-145 (1957)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

All past interpretations of this passage involve an obscure train of thought. There appear to be two ideas running right through; light-twilight-night, and quick-slow-. But how are we to combine these ideas so as to make sense of them? Most, if not all, past commentators have agreed in taking to mean ‘punishes’’ and most interpretations conform to one or other of the following patterns

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aeschylus, Choephori, 61–65.N. B. Booth - 1957 - Classical Quarterly 7 (3-4):143-.
Truth and Imagination in Spinoza's Metaphysics.Philip Michael Mouch - 1998 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester
Can There Be History of Philosophy?Gordon Graham - 1982 - History and Theory 21 (1):37-52.
The Value of Sense Perception.Mohammad Faali - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 22.
Existence, the past, and God.John E. Smith - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (2):287 - 295.
Nothing happened: a history.Susan A. Crane - 2020 - Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
3 (#1,728,901)

6 months
2 (#1,259,626)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references