In Andrew Brook, Don Ross & David L. Thompson (eds.), Dennett's Philosophy: A Comprehensive Assessment. MIT Press (2000)
Now that some years have passed, how does this picture of consciousness look? On the one hand, Dennett's work has vastly expanded the range of options for thinking about conscious experiences and conscious subjects. On the other hand, I suspect that the implications of his picture have been oversold (perhaps more by others than by Dennett himself). The rhetoric of _CE_ is radical in places but I do not sure that the actual implications for commonsense views of Seemings and Subjects are nearly as radical.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Weak Motivational Internalism, Lite: Dispositions, Moral Judgments, and What We're Motivated to Do.Jesse Steinberg - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (sup1):1-24.
Multiple Drafts: An Eternal Golden Braid?Daniel C. Dennett & Marcel Kinsbourne - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):810.
Lost the Plot? Reconstructing Dennett's Multiple Drafts Theory of Consciousness.Kathleen Akins - 1996 - Mind and Language 11 (1):1-43.
"The Best Set of Tools"? Dennett's Metaphors and the Mind-Body Problem.Robert Kirk - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (172):335-43.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #187,418 of 2,158,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #353,777 of 2,158,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?