Right and Good

In Weighing lives. New York: Oxford University Press (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter considers how far what one ought to do when facing a decision of life and death is determined by the goodness of the distribution that will result. It defines, examines and assesses the principles of teleology and consequentialism in ethics. It compares normative theory with axiology. It considers how far a person’s lifetime wellbeing depends on all the wellbeing that comes to the person at times within her life, and how far the goodness of the world depends on the wellbeing of the people. It introduces the idea of pattern goods such as equality and longevity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Right against good.George Beiswanger - 1949 - Ethics 60 (2):112-119.
The right, the good & the happy.Bernard L. Ramm - 1971 - Waco, Tex.,: Word Books.
The right and good: Methodology in ethics.Sarah H. Brown - 1933 - Journal of Philosophy 30 (15):393-399.
Right and Good: False Dichotomy?Anne Maclean - 1985 - Philosophy 60 (231):129-132.
Right and Good: False Dichotomy?Anne Maclean - 1985 - Philosophy 60 (231):129 - 132.
Moore on the right, the good, and uncertainty.Michael Smith - 2006 - In Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 2006--133.
On Right and Good: Preliminary Survey.W. G. de Burgh - 1930 - Philosophy 5 (18):246-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Broome
University Of Oxford

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references