Topology Change and the Unity of Space

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (2):227-246 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Must space be a unity? This question, which exercised Aristotle, Descartes and Kant, is a specific instance of a more general one; namely, can the topology of physical space change with time? In this paper we show how the discussion of the unity of space has been altered but survives in contemporary research in theoretical physics. With a pedagogical review of the role played by the Euler characteristic in the mathematics of relativistic spacetimes, we explain how classical general relativity (modulo considerations about energy conditions) allows virtually unrestrained spatial topology change in four dimensions. We also survey the situation in many other dimensions of interest. However, topology change comes with a cost: a famous theorem by Robert Geroch shows that, for many interesting types of such change, transitions of spatial topology imply the existence of closed timelike curves or temporal non-orientability. Ways of living with this theorem and of evading it are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cohomology for Anyone.David A. Rabson, John F. Huesman & Benji N. Fisher - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (12):1769-1796.
Natural Topology.Frank Waaldijk - 2012 - Brouwer Society.
Similarity, Topology, and Physical Significance in Relativity Theory.Samuel C. Fletcher - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (2):365-389.
Mirror symmetry: What is it for relational space to be orientable?Nick Huggett - 2002 - In Katherine Brading & Elena Castellani (eds.), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 281.
Inductively generated formal topologies.Thierry Coquand, Giovanni Sambin, Jan Smith & Silvio Valentini - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 124 (1-3):71-106.
Are Causality Violations Undesirable?Hunter Monroe - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (11):1065-1069.
The space of minimal structures.Oleg Belegradek - 2014 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 60 (1-2):40-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
45 (#344,810)

6 months
7 (#592,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Craig Callender
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

Time travel and time machines.Chris Smeenk & Christian Wuthrich - 2011 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press. pp. 577-630.
The Implementation, Interpretation, and Justification of Likelihoods in Cosmology.C. D. McCoy - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 62:19-35.
Curve it, gauge it, or leave it? Practical underdetermination in gravitational theories.Holger Lyre & Tim Oliver Eynck - 2001 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (2):277-303.
Philosophy of Space‐Time Physics.Craig Callender & Carl Hoefer - 2002 - In Peter K. Machamer & Michael Silberstein (eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of science. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 173–198.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Paradoxes of Time Travel.David K. Lewis - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):145-152.
Spaces and Times.Anthony Quinton - 1962 - Philosophy 37 (140):130 - 147.
On the unity of space.Robert Weingard - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 29 (3):215 - 220.
Does the topology of space fluctuate?Arlen Anderson & Bryce DeWitt - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (2):91-105.

Add more references