Manilius 1. 466–8 and 515–17

Classical Quarterly 7 (3-4):186-187 (1957)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Astronomy has been known to profit on occasion from the observations of amateurs; and so perhaps, in its less technical passages, could the Astronomica. I venture to dispute the emendations of Mr. Shackleton Bailey in the first two items of his learned Maniliana.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Manilius 1. 466–8 and 515–17.A. Y. Campbell - 1957 - Classical Quarterly 7 (3-4):186-.
Maniliana.D. R. Shackleton Bailey - 1956 - Classical Quarterly 6 (1-2):81-.
Two Editions of Manilivs.H. W. Garrod - 1908 - Classical Quarterly 2 (02):123-.
Two Editions of Manilivs1.H. W. Garrod - 1908 - Classical Quarterly 2 (2):123-13.
Manilius, Astronomica 1.91-94.M. Dickie - 2002 - Hermes 130 (4):449-466.
Manilius Astronomica. [REVIEW]Roland Mayer - 1999 - The Classical Review 49 (1):267-267.
Manilius 1.88.Peter E. Knox - 1989 - Classical Quarterly 39 (02):564-.
Manilius 1.88.Peter E. Knox - 1989 - Classical Quarterly 39 (2):564-565.
Some Emendations of Manilius.Robinson Ellis - 1890 - The Classical Review 4 (05):193-195.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
8 (#1,318,140)

6 months
1 (#1,471,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references