Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):361-368 (1987)
Feminists and gay liberationists condemn romantic love as an inherently sexist and heterosexist institution which requires sexist idealizations and heterosexual desire. I argue that although romantic love in contemporary Western societies often includes sexist idealizations and heterosexual desire, those elements are not necessary constituents of the concept of romantic love. The crucial elements in romantic love are concern, admiration, the desire for reciprocation, and the passion for union, none of which require either sexist idealizations or heterosexual sexual desire
|Keywords||Catholic Tradition Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Just Friends, Friends and Lovers, Or…?Caroline J. Simon - 1993 - Philosophy and Theology 8 (2):113-128.
Bestowal Without Appraisal: Problems in Frankfurt's Characterization of Love and Personal Identity. [REVIEW]Gary Foster - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):153 - 168.
Love, Ethics, and Authenticity: Beauvoir's Lesson in What It Means to Read.Walker Michelle Boulous - 2010 - Hypatia 25 (2):334 - 356.
In the Name of Love: Romantic Ideology and its Victims.Aaron Ben-Ze'ev & Ruhama Goussinsky - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Two Forms of Love: The Problem of Preferential Love in Kierkegaard's Works of Love.Sharon Krishek - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):595-617.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads19 ( #254,171 of 2,154,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,759 of 2,154,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?