Strong scientific theorizing is needed to improve replicability in psychological science

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consciousness, folk psychology, and cognitive science.Alvin I. Goldman - 1993 - Consciousness and Cognition 2 (4):364-382.
The Epistemic Norms of Intra-Scientific Testimony.Mikkel Gerken - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (6):568-595.
The psychology of scientific explanation.J. D. Trout - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (3):564–591.
Simulated experiments: Methodology for a virtual world.Winsberg Eric - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):105-125.
The meaning of “psychological” in a line of theorizing.Joseph F. Rychlak - 1986 - Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 6 (2):114-118.
Strong scientific theories.John Henry Harris - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (2):182-205.
Replicability of Experiment.John D. Norton - 2015 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 30 (2):229.
The Unplanned Obsolescence of Psychological Science and an Argument for its Revival.Stan Klein - 2016 - Pyshcology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 3:357-379.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-28

Downloads
13 (#1,030,551)

6 months
5 (#625,697)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references