Parecidos de familia. Michael P. Hodges y John Lachs, Thinking in the Ruins. Wittgenstein and Santayana on Contingency [Book Review]

Laguna 7 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thinking in the Ruins: Wittgenstein and Santayana on Contingency.Michael Hodges & John Lachs - 2001 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 37 (1):137-142.
Thinking in the ruins: Wittgenstein and Santayana on contingency.Michael P. Hodges - 2000 - Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press. Edited by John Lachs.
Introduction: John Lachs's Philosophical Pluralism.Eric Ritter - 2024 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 59 (3):293-296.
John Lachs, "George Santayana". [REVIEW]T. L. S. Sprigge - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40 (58):119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Perez-Chico
Universidad de La Laguna

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references