Philosophy 49 (188):179 - 189 (1974)
When a normative moral theory collides with our beliefs, we must change either our beliefs or our theory. It is not always clear which we should change; but it is clear that we must change something. I shall consider two collisions between utilitarianism and what we believe, or are supposed to believe. About the first collision, I am going to say that the belief is false and that therefore there is no call to change utilitarianism. About the second, I am going to say that if the belief is true, utilitarianism cannot be changed to accommodate it; I shall leave it open, though, whether the belief is true. The two collisions are related, though different. They both concern the utilitarian thesis about self-sacrifice
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Challenging the Moral Status of Blood Donation.Paul C. Snelling - 2012 - Health Care Analysis (4):1-26.
Similar books and articles
The Impertinent Self: A Heroic History of Modernity.Josef Früchtl - 2009 - Stanford University Press.
Saints as the 'Living Gospel': Von Balthasar's Revealers of the Revealer, Rahner's Mediators of the Mediator.Patricia A. Sullivan - 2014 - Heythrop Journal 55 (2):270-285.
Whistle Blowers: Saints of Secular Culture. [REVIEW]Colin Grant - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (4):391 - 399.
The Impertinent Self: A Heroic History of Modernity and Film.Josef Früchtl - 2009 - Stanford University Press.
Saints and Heroes: A Plea for the Supererogatory.Patricia M. McGoldrick - 1984 - Philosophy 59 (230):523 - 528.
Saints and Heroes.J. O. Urmson - 1958 - In A. I. Melden (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosophy. University of Washington Press.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads32 ( #152,408 of 2,132,862 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #288,410 of 2,132,862 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.