- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reforming peer review: From recycling to reflexivity
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):204-204 (1982)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy. Daryl E. Chubin, Edward J. Hackett.Ronald J. Overmann - 1991 - Isis 82 (4):711-712.
Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy by Daryl E. Chubin; Edward J. Hackett. [REVIEW]Ronald Overman - 1991 - Isis 82:711-712.
Sociology of Sciences: An Annotated Bibliography on Invisible Colleges, 1972-1981 by Daryl E. Chubin. [REVIEW]Susan Crawford - 1984 - Isis 75:567-567.
The Cancer Mission: Social Contexts of Biomedical Research. Kenneth E. Studer, Daryl E. Chubin.Robert Bud - 1981 - Isis 72 (4):659-660.
The Cancer Mission: Social Contexts of Biomedical Research by Kenneth E. Studer; Daryl E. Chubin. [REVIEW]Robert Bud - 1981 - Isis 72:659-660.
Medical Sciences Kenneth E. Studer and Daryl E. Chubin, The Cancer Mission: social contexts of biomedical research. Beverly Hills & London: Sage, 1980. Pp. 320. No price stated. [REVIEW]Alan Irwin - 1983 - British Journal for the History of Science 16 (1):93-95.
Reflections from the peer review mirror.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):167-186.
Peer review reliability: The hierarchy of the sciences.Charles Crothers - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):398-399.
Is there an alternative to peer review?Richard Greene - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):149-150.
Peer review in the physical sciences: An editor's view.William M. Honig - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):216-217.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
18 (#859,738)
6 months
7 (#491,170)
2014-01-20
Downloads
18 (#859,738)
6 months
7 (#491,170)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A challenge to Peters and Ceci's conclusions with an examination of editorial files for reviewer appropriateness.Robert Boice, Gayle Pecker, Ellen Zaback & David H. Barlow - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):744-745.
Some reactions to manuscript review from a questionnaire study.Charles N. Cofer - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):745-746.
Peer review: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):747-750.
Administrative freedom versus academic freedom and peer reviews.Russell L. Berry - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):743-744.
Tacit agreements between authors and editors.Robert J. Sternberg - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):746-747.
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Norman W. Storer.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-w2v2s uwo