Adaptation, multilevel selection and organismality: A clash of perspectives
In Richard Joyce (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Evolution and Philosophy. Routledge (forthcoming)
Abstract
The concept of adaptation is pivotal to modern evolutionary thinking, but it has long been the subject of controversy, especially in respect of the relative roles of selection versus constraints in explaining the traits of organisms. This paper tackles a different problem for the concept of adaptation: its interpretation in light of multilevel selection theory. In particular, I arbitrate a dispute that has broken out between the proponents of rival perspectives on multilevel adaptations. Many experts now say that multilevel and kin selection views are mathematically equivalent to one another—that the mathematical accounting of evolution can be carried out at any hierarchical level one chooses. But what does this formal equivalence imply - are they equivalent in other ways too? I show here that significant conceptual non-equivalence has survived: the two sides commit to different views regarding how much selection has to act at a level before we can call traits at that level adaptations; about whether policing mechanisms are adaptations, and about whether non-organisms can bear adaptations.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Alternative formulations of multilevel selection.John Damuth & I. Lorraine Heisler - 1988 - Biology and Philosophy 3 (4):407-430.
Can Cumulative Selection Explain Adaptation?Bence Nanay - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1099-1112.
The Paradox of Sexual Reproduction and the Levels of Selection: Can Sociobiology Shed a Light?Joachim Dagg - 2012 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 4 (20130604).
Multilevel selection and the return of group-level functionalism.David Sloan Wilson & Elliott Sober - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):305-306.
Distinguishing Natural Selection from Other Evolutionary Processes in the Evolution of Altruism.Pierrick Bourrat - 2015 - Biological Theory 10 (4):311-321.
The evolution of failure: explaining cancer as an evolutionary process.Christopher Lean & Anya Plutynski - 2016 - Biology and Philosophy 31 (1):39-57.
Hierarchical approach to replication and selection.Alexei A. Sharov - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):905-906.
Adaptation as process: the future of Darwinism and the legacy of Theodosius Dobzhansky.David J. Depew - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):89-98.
Local Interaction, Multilevel Selection, and Evolutionary Transitions.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2006 - Biological Theory 1 (4):372-380.
A critique of R.d. Alexander's views on group selection.David Sloan Wilson - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (3):431-449.
Rx: Distinguish group selection from group adaptation.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (4):628-629.
Adaptation and Multilevel Selection: What Does the Evolutionary Transitions Program Tell Us?Philippe Huneman - unknown
A formal investigation of Cultural Selection Theory: acoustic adaptation in bird song.G. K. D. Crozier - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (5):781-801.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-13
Downloads
316 (#37,680)
6 months
23 (#50,511)
2016-06-13
Downloads
316 (#37,680)
6 months
23 (#50,511)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A defence of the evolutionary debunking argument.Man Him Ip - 2021 - Dissertation, University of Birmingham