The significance of signatures: Why the framers signed the constitution and what they meant by doing so
In this article, I discuss the signatures on the U.S. Constitution. I begin with a historical account of the Constitution's signing, noting in particular that unlike its ancestors, the Constitution was signed well before it began to assume legal status. I then explore the ways in which the Constitution's signatures served as useful advertisements for the document during ratification. Finally, I demonstrate that the Constitution's signatures (and the clause introducing them) gave rise to considerable interpretive ambiguity during both the Constitutional Convention and the ratification process that followed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Democratic Constitution-Making and Unfreezing the Turkish Process.A. Arato - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (3-4):473-487.
The Constitution of a Federal Commonwealth: The Making and Meaning of the Australian Constitution.Nicholas Aroney - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
Meaningful Electronic Signatures Based on an Automatic Indexing Method.Maxime Wack, Ahmed Nait-Sidi-Moh, Sid Lamrous & Nathanael Cottin - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (3):161-175.
Against Originalism: Getting Over the U. S. Constitution.Austin W. Bramwell - 2004 - Critical Review 16 (4):431-453.
Function and Self-Constitution: How to Make Something of Yourself Without Being All That You Can Be. A Commentary on Christine Korsgaard's The Constitution of Agency and Self-Constitution.A. Barandalla & M. Ridge - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):364-380.
A Puzzle About Material Constitution and How to Solve It: Enriching Constitution Views in Metaphysics.Robert A. Wilson - 2007 - Philosophers' Imprint 7 (5):1-20.
Aristotle and Xenophon on Democracy and Oligarchy.J. M. Moore (ed.) - 1975 - University of California Press.
Interpretive and Noninterpretive Constitutional Theory:The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights. Michael J. Perry; Constitutional Fate: Theory of the Constitution. Philip Bobbitt. [REVIEW]Arval A. Morris - 1984 - Ethics 94 (3):501-.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #320,334 of 2,146,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #385,507 of 2,146,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.