The significance of signatures: Why the framers signed the constitution and what they meant by doing so
AbstractIn this article, I discuss the signatures on the U.S. Constitution. I begin with a historical account of the Constitution's signing, noting in particular that unlike its ancestors, the Constitution was signed well before it began to assume legal status. I then explore the ways in which the Constitution's signatures served as useful advertisements for the document during ratification. Finally, I demonstrate that the Constitution's signatures (and the clause introducing them) gave rise to considerable interpretive ambiguity during both the Constitutional Convention and the ratification process that followed.
Similar books and articles
The Constitution of a Federal Commonwealth: The Making and Meaning of the Australian Constitution.Nicholas Aroney - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
Meaningful Electronic Signatures Based on an Automatic Indexing Method.Maxime Wack, Ahmed Nait-Sidi-Moh, Sid Lamrous & Nathanael Cottin - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (3):161-175.
Against Originalism: Getting Over the U. S. Constitution.Austin W. Bramwell - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (4):431-453.
Function and Self-Constitution: How to Make Something of Yourself Without Being All That You Can Be. A Commentary on Christine Korsgaard's The Constitution of Agency and Self-Constitution.A. Barandalla & M. Ridge - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):364-380.
A Puzzle About Material Constitution and How to Solve It: Enriching Constitution Views in Metaphysics.Robert A. Wilson - 2007 - Philosophers' Imprint 7:1-20.
Interpretive and Noninterpretive Constitutional Theory:The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights. Michael J. Perry; Constitutional Fate: Theory of the Constitution. Philip Bobbitt. [REVIEW]Arval A. Morris - 1984 - Ethics 94 (3):501-.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads