On an Alleged Non‐Equivalence Between Dispositions and Disjunctive Properties

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):77-81 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper shows that grounded dispositions are necessarily coextensive with disjunctive properties. It responds to several objections against this thesis, and then shows how to construct a disjunctive property necessarily coextensive with an arbitrary grounded disposition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On an Alleged Non‐Equivalence Between Dispositions and Disjunctive Properties.Jonathan Cohen - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):77-81.
Plenitude and necessarily unmanifested dispositions.Jonas Werner - 2021 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):169-177.
Do Extrinsic Dispositions Need Extrinsic Causal Bases?Gabriele Contessa - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):622-638.
A case for extrinsic dispositions.Jennifer McKitrick - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):155 – 174.
In defense of the disjunctive.Alexander Skiles - 2016 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (5):471-487.
The Ontology of Pure Dispositions.William A. Bauer - 2010 - Dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-22

Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)

6 months
2 (#1,259,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Cohen
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

Should Explanations Omit the Details?Darren Bradley - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (3):827-853.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references