Speech and communication in law and philosophy

Legal Theory 12 (1):1-17 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What does mean in constitutional First Amendment law and in ordinary language and the philosophy of language? Under what circumstances does intentional action count as speech? Can communication be unintentional? And what follows (in law) from the fact that almost any action can be made expressive?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Freedom of communicative action.Lawrence B. Solum - 1989 - Northwestern University Law Review 83 (1):54-135.
Nixon's “full-speech”: Imaginary and symbolic registers of communication.Derek Hook - 2013 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 33 (1):32-50.
A linguistic model of informed consent.Jan Marta - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1):41-60.
Consciousness and action/motion theories of communication.W. Bailey - 1986 - Western Journal of Speech Communication 50:74-86.
Two Educational Ideas for 2011 and Beyond.Charles Bingham - 2011 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 30 (5):513-519.
Hand-to-hand combat, or mouth-to-mouth resuscitation?Michael C. Corballis - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):242-250.
Speech acts without propositions?Marina Sbisà - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):155-178.
Rhetoric and Philosophy.Richard A. Cherwitz (ed.) - 1990 - L. Erlbaum Associates.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
24 (#656,974)

6 months
2 (#1,198,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references