Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):155-178 (2006)

This paper argues that understanding speech in terms of action requires dispensing with propositions. Austin's outline of speech act theory did not give any role to propositions, which were introduced into speech act theory later on, in order to cope with criticism leveled by Strawson and Searle at Austin's characterization of the locutionary act and his view of the truth/falsity assessment. The introduction of propositions had weakening effects on the claim that speech is action, foregrounding again the received picture of linguistic communication. I show that, in order to make sense of Austin's characterization of the locutionary act, propositions are not needed and give some suggestions as to how one could give an account of the truth/falsity assessment, compatible with the claim that speech is action, without resorting to propositions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/18756735-072001008
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,037
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Oppressive Speech.Mary Kate McGowan - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):389 – 407.
Performatives and Antiperformatives.Ingvar Johansson - 2003 - Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (6):661-702.
Negative Acts.Stefanov Gheorghe - 2010 - Analele Universitatii Bucuresti - Filosofie (LIX):3-9.
Speech and the Social Contract.Roy Turner - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):43 – 53.
Elements of Speech Act Theory in the Work of Thomas Reid.Karl Schuhmann & Barry Smith - 1990 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1):47 - 66.
A Note on J. L. Austin and the Drama.Bryan Magee - 1999 - Philosophy 74 (1):119-121.


Added to PP index

Total views
128 ( #84,354 of 2,454,402 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,790 of 2,454,402 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes