Between abstraction and idealization: Scientific practice and philosophical awareness

The aim of this essay is to emphasize a number of important points that will provide a better understanding of the history of philosophical thought concerning scientific knowledge. The main points made are: (a) that the principal way of viewing abstraction which has dominated the history of thought and epistemology up to the present is influenced by the original Aristotelian position; (b) that with the birth of modern science a new way of conceiving abstraction came into being which is better characterized by the term idealization, the name that was later, in fact, to be used by scientists to describe their scientific activity; (c) that, however, on account of the influence of empirical and inductive philosophy, scientists have often not had sufficient methodological awareness of this new way of viewing abstraction; (d) that this new concept of abstraction has frequently been expressed in the framework of philosophies that lie outside the mainstream of contemporary epistemology or even exhibit marked anti-scientific tendencies; (e) that the theme of idealization has been taken up again in the last few decades and a great contribution in this direction has been made by the so-called Pozna school of methodology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
How the Laws of Physics Lie.Malcolm R. Forster - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (3):478-480.
The Structure of Science.Ernest Nagel - 1961 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):275-275.
Galilean Idealization.Ernan McMullin - 1985 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 16 (3):247.

View all 59 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Strengthening of the Caesar Problem.Joongol Kim - 2011 - Erkenntnis 75 (1):123-136.
The Structure of Idealization in Biological Theories: The Case of the Wright-Fisher Model.Donato Rodriguez Xavier & Arroyo-Santos Alfonso - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie.
A General Theory of Abstraction Operators.Neil Tennant - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):105-133.
How Scientific Models Can Explain.Alisa Bokulich - 2011 - Synthese 180 (1):33 - 45.
The Limits of Abstraction.Kit Fine - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Idealization, Abstraction, and the Policy Relevance of Economic Theories.Menno Rol - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (1):69-97.
Idealization and Abstraction: A Framework.Martin R. Jones - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 86 (1):173-218.
Abstraction and Idealization in Edmund Husserl and Georg Cantor Prior to 1895.Claire Ortiz Hill - 2004 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):217-244.


Added to PP index

Total views
49 ( #180,877 of 2,286,035 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #835,155 of 2,286,035 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature