Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 501-515 (2008)

Monte Cook
University of Oklahoma
A long tradition regards Robert Desgabets as a Cartesian empiricist. He says things that sound strikingly like Locke, and he argues against anti-empiricist reasoning in Descartes, Malebranche, and Arnauld. Moreover, throughout his writings he endorses the empiricist principle that nothing is in the intellect except what was previously in the senses. Since the Cartesians are generally supposed to be prototypical non -empiricists, Desgabets’s being a Cartesian empiricist would make him a particularly interesting specimen. In this paper, however, I challenge the case for taking Desgabets to be an empiricist.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hph.0.0068
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,321
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Robert Desgabets.Patricia Easton - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Desgabets on the Creation of Eternal Truths.Monte Cook - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (1):21-36.
Desgabets on Cartesian Minds.Timothy D. Miller - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4):723 – 745.
Robert Desgabets's Representation Principle.Monte Cook - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2):189-200.
Empiricism, Conservativeness, and Quasi-Truth.Otávio Bueno - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):485.
Empiricist Word Learning.Dan Ryder & Oleg V. Favorov - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1117-1117.


Added to PP index

Total views
33 ( #315,344 of 2,419,798 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #248,793 of 2,419,798 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes