Are There Necessary Truths About Rights?

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 15 (1):21-49 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The essay considers whether there are necessary truths about rights. The existence of rights is contingent, but our practices involving rights rest upon fundamental conceptual assumptions necessary to their coherence. Hohfeld's analysis is proffered as the embodiment of those assumptions. An examination of the concept of necessity shows how those assumptions can be necessary truths about rights without being logically necessary

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A new problem for the linguistic doctrine of necessary truth.Gillian Russell - 2010 - In Cory Wright & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (eds.), New Waves in Truth. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 267--281.
The Grounds of Necessity.Ross P. Cameron - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (4):348-358.
Evolution and the Necessities of Thought.Barry Stroud - 2002 - In Stewart Candlish (ed.), Meaning, Understanding, and Practice. Oxford University Press.
How Free are Initial Conditions?Lawrence Sklar - 1990 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990 (2):551-564.
An Age of Rights?N. E. Simmonds - 2023 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 36 (2):553-574.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Down the Methodological Rabbit Hole.David Frydrych - 2017 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 49 (147):41-73.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references