Correction: Projection

Philosophy 42 (160):190-190 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Three misprints occurred in the paper, Projection, by Arthur Child, published in Philosophy, Vol. XLII, No. 159, January 1967, pp. 20–36. On p. 21, 1.35, for ‘…in the entire…’ read ‘…is the entire…’. On p. 22, last line, delete the three dots. On p. 36, 1. 20, for ‘The good projected …’ read ‘The god projected …’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Notebook.[author unknown] - 1999 - Philosophy 74 (4):626-626.
Errata.[author unknown] - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (22):176-176.
Corrigenda to Vol. XX.[author unknown] - 1906 - The Classical Review 20 (9):504-504.
Errata.[author unknown] - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (64):294-294.
Notes on Sophocles' Antigone: Corrigenda.Hugh Lloyd-Jones - 1957 - Classical Quarterly 7 (3-4):224-224.
Errata.[author unknown] - 1909 - The Classical Review 23 (1):32-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references