An integrated framework for ought-to-be and ought-to-do constraints

Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (2):77-111 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,271

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Semantics and Pragmatics of Presupposition.Alex Lascarides - 1998 - Journal of Semantics 15 (3):239-300.
Constraining the adaptationism debate.Roger Sansom - 2003 - Biology and Philosophy 18 (4):493-512.
Brain evolution: How constrained is it?Georg F. Striedter - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):296-297.
Competence: A tale of two constructs.Gerard Lum - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (12):1193-1204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-31

Downloads
60 (#261,064)

6 months
2 (#1,244,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Formal Characterisation of Hamblin’s Action-State Semantics.Chris Reed & Timothy J. Norman - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (4):415 - 448.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references