Metaphysica 18 (1):151-154 (2017)

Nicholas Danne
University of South Carolina
I remark that not all fundamentals are introductions. This book could be tough for beginners.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/mp-2016-0019
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,814
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reply to Eaton and Pickavance.Brian Weatherson - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (12):3231-3233.
Response to Robert Koons and Matthew O’Brien’s “Objects of Intention.Christopher Tollefsen - 2013 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):751 - 778.
Springs of Action.Robert C. Koons - 1993 - Review of Metaphysics 46 (4):861-863.
Epistemological Foundations for Koons' Cosmological Argument?Graham Oppy - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):107 - 125.
Koons' Cosmological Argument.Graham Oppy - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (3):378-389.
Reply to Robert Koons.Anil Gupta & Nuel Belnap - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (4):632-636.
Skeptics Can Win (But Almost Never Will).Timothy Pickavance - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (3):371-394.


Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #239,206 of 2,425,830 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #190,027 of 2,425,830 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes