- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Commentary on ‘On Being Objective: Hard data, soft data and baseball’
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
Soft ethics: its application to the General Data Protection Regulation and its dual advantage.Luciano Floridi - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (1):163-167.
Soft skills and hard numbers: Gender discourse in human resources.Renyi Hong - 2016 - Big Data and Society 3 (2).
Commentary on “the politics of certainty” (c. A. rubino).Sheldon Krimsky - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):509-510.
Assessing the impact of digital education and the role of the big data analytics course to enhance the skills and employability of engineering students.Lin Xu, Jingxiao Zhang, Yiying Ding, Gangzhu Sun, Wei Zhang, Simon P. Philbin & Brian H. W. Guo - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Soft Methods for Data Science.M. B. Ferraro, P. Giordani, B. Vantaggi, M. Gagolewski, P. Grzegorzewski, O. Hryniewicz & María Ángeles Gil (eds.) - 2017
Soft vs. Hard.Brian Penrose - 2010-09-24 - In Fritz Allhoff & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Cannabis Philosophy for Everyone. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 162–172.
Mathematics and Measurements for High-throughput Quantitative Biology.Harald Martens & Achim Kohler - 2009 - Biological Theory 4 (1):29-43.
Blinded by ‘science’: Commentary on Jenicek, M. (2006) ‘The hard art of soft science’ Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12, 410-419. [REVIEW]Michael Loughlin - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (4):423-426.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-12-20
Downloads
10 (#1,221,969)
6 months
2 (#1,259,626)
2016-12-20
Downloads
10 (#1,221,969)
6 months
2 (#1,259,626)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-7qn45 uwo