Authors
Candice Delmas
Northeastern University
Abstract
Is the civic duty to report crime and corruption a genuine moral duty? After clarifying the nature of the duty, I consider a couple of negative answers to the question, and turn to an attractive and commonly held view, according to which this civic duty is a genuine moral duty. On this view, crime and corruption threaten political stability, and citizens have a moral duty to report crime and corruption to the government in order to help the government’s law enforcement efforts. The resulting duty is triply general in that it applies to everyone, everywhere, and covers all criminal and corrupt activity. In this paper, I challenge the general scope of this argument. I argue that that the civic duty to report crime and corruption to the authorities is much narrower than the government claims and people might think, for it only arises when the state (i) condemns genuine wrongdoing and serious ethical offenses as “crime” and “corruption,” and (ii) constitutes a dependable “disclosure recipient,” showing the will and power to hold wrongdoers accountable. I further defend a robust duty to directly report to the public—one that is weightier and wider than people usually assume. When condition (ii) fails to obtain, I submit, citizens are released of the duty to report crime and corruption to the authorities, but are bound to report to the public, even when the denunciation targets the government and is risky or illegal.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.7202/1024294ar
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Theory of Freedom of Expression.Thomas Scanlon - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (2):204-226.
Political Obligation.Richard Dagger - unknown - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Justification of Whistleblowing.Daniele Santoro & Manohar Kumar - 2017 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 43 (7):669-684.
Leaks and the Limits of Press Freedom.Eric R. Boot - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (2):483-500.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is There a Duty to Die?John Hardwig - 1997 - Hastings Center Report 27 (2):34-42.
Can I Have a Duty to Believe in God?Jonathan Harrison - 1957 - Philosophy 32 (122):241 - 252.
A Duty to Adopt?Daniel Friedrich - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):25-39.
Human Rights and Democracy: India’s Experience.Aynul Haque - 2014 - SOCRATES 2 (JUNE 2014):114- 125.
The Alleged Moral Repugnance of Acting From Duty.Marcia Baron - 1984 - Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):197-220.
Rescuing the Duty to Rescue.Tina Rulli & Joseph Millum - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics:1-5.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-04-25

Total views
208 ( #49,192 of 2,448,591 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #83,570 of 2,448,591 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes