Why Tolerance Cannot Be Our Principal Value

Bijdragen 71 (4):377-390 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Whereas the concept of ‘tolerance’ was a marginal category from the end of the sixteenth century, it has become a political key concept today. Have we not all become strangers and foreigners? As such the concept of ‘strangeness’ has lost its relevance. In recent times we witness a new turn in the dialectics of tolerance. It becomes a political and polemical category allowing for a distinct segregation between ‘them’ and ‘we’. The concept explains ‘why we are civilized and they are barbarian’ . Therefore we must ask ourselves how tolerance can be saved

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ups and Downs of tolerance.Theo W. A. de Wit - 2002 - Bijdragen 63 (4):387-416.
The Concept of tolerance.Anders Hansson - 2007 - Theoria 73 (4):284-303.
Tolerance among the virtues.John R. Bowlin - 2016 - Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Concordantia Et Differentia.Inigo Bocken - 1996 - Bijdragen 57 (1):40-61.
Tolerance or Hospitality?Mengwei Yan - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 68:123-127.
Modern social approaches to the philosophy of tolerance.Nigar A. Huseynova - 2020 - Вісник Харківського Національного Університету Імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Філософія. Філософські Перипетії» 63:51-58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-18

Downloads
21 (#726,807)

6 months
21 (#166,473)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references