Donating gametes for research and therapy: a reply to Donald Evans

Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (2):93-95 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There has been a troublesome anomaly in the UK between cash payment to men for sperm donation and the effective assumption that women will pay to donate eggs. Some commentators, including Donald Evans in this journal, have argued that the anomaly should be resolved by treating women on the same terms as men. But this argument ignores important difficulties about property in the body, particularly in relation to gametes. There are good reasons for thinking that the contract model and payment for gametes are both inappropriate, and that a model based on altruism should be applied to both sexes.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-24

Downloads
264 (#81,643)

6 months
82 (#72,774)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donna Dickenson
Birkbeck, University of London

Citations of this work

The Lady Vanishes: What’s Missing from the Stem Cell Debate.Donna L. Dickenson - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):43-54.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Right to Private Property.Jeremy Waldron & Stephen A. Munzer - 1992 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 21 (2):196-206.

Add more references