Interpretive description in applied mixed methods research: Exploring issues of fit, purpose, process, context, and design

Nursing Inquiry 30 (3):e12542 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As mixed methods research approaches become increasingly more common, it is imperative they are conducted in a thoughtful and rigorous manner to yield useful results. While researchers have begun to explore the use of various qualitative research methodologies in mixed methods research, there is a gap in literature discussing the philosophical congruence of using interpretive description in mixed method studies, and how to ensure rigor while integrating interpretive description results. Our purpose in writing this article is to discuss the issues of fit, purpose, process, context, and design when using interpretive description in mixed methods research approaches by drawing on examples from the literature. Further, we explore the contributions that interpretive description can make in a mixed methods inquiry. This article offers a first step in using a purposeful approach to mixed methods interpretive description studies to increase transparency and rigor in this relatively new methodology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Confronting the dilemma of mixed methods.Bradford J. Wiggins - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (1):44.
Appraising Mixed Methods Research.Elizabeth J. Halcomb - 2019 - In Pranee Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore. pp. 1051-1067.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-06

Downloads
5 (#847,061)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How We Think.W. B. Pillsbury & John Dewey - 1911 - Philosophical Review 20 (4):441.

Add more references